*/
Immigration – Removal. The claimant Pakistani national sought judicial review of the defendant Secretary of State's decision to remove him and detain him pending his removal. The Secretary of State contended that the application should fail because the claimant had an alternative remedy. The Administrative Court considered the potential conflict in the jurisprudence of the High Court and the Upper Tribunal as to the principles governing when the jurisdiction of the High Court should be exercised. It then refused to entertain the application, as an alternative remedy existed by way of out of country appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) and that was the proper avenue for challenging the Secretary of State's decision.
Immigration – Removal. The claimant Pakistani national sought judicial review of the defendant Secretary of State's decision to remove him and detain him pending his removal. The Secretary of State contended that the application should fail because the claimant had an alternative remedy. The Administrative Court considered the potential conflict in the jurisprudence of the High Court and the Upper Tribunal as to the principles governing when the jurisdiction of the High Court should be exercised. It then refused to entertain the application, as an alternative remedy existed by way of out of country appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) and that was the proper avenue for challenging the Secretary of State's decision.
Signs of real change – more work to be done
Philip N Bristow explains how to unlock your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step
With the property market witnessing significant changes since the beginning of the pandemic, Fleet Street Wealth’s Managing Director Julian Morgan considers the future of the home, the second home and the office
In partnership with the Bar Council, LexisNexis is offering up to 60% off its extensive webinar offering.
Chambers is expanding its team.
Making a move from the Bar to a career in governance: Maria Brookes outlines three good reasons to switch and how to do it
The family law system is in crisis and a failure to recognise it as such demeans the Herculean efforts of all involved, writes Celestine Greenwood, an exhausted family practitioner
Time to look afresh at the imposter syndrome narrative? Why pathologizing normal anxieties can be unhelpful to barristers and future generations. By Kate Brunner QC and Sarah Regan
Cultural change is actually just a numbers game joining the dots and wearing the pin.Chris Gutteridge's lessons learnt...
The pandemic and widespread introduction of remote hearings has been an interesting start to a career at the Bar: Lola-Rose Avery shares a day in her life
Shifting the taboo, two silks talk about the menopause, its impact on women at the Bar and the need for a profession-wide rethink. By Lyndsey de Mestre QC and Brie Stevens-Hoare QC
