*/
Immigration – Removal. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the appellants' appeals against the decision of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), dismissing their claims for judicial review of the respondent Secretary of State's refusal to admit their representations as fresh claims for asylum. It was not possible to say that those decisions had been irrational in the light of the applicable test and the Secretary of State had not failed to have proper regard to any true vulnerability of the appellants.
Immigration – Removal. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the appellants' appeals against the decision of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), dismissing their claims for judicial review of the respondent Secretary of State's refusal to admit their representations as fresh claims for asylum. It was not possible to say that those decisions had been irrational in the light of the applicable test and the Secretary of State had not failed to have proper regard to any true vulnerability of the appellants.
Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights some of the key achievements at the Bar Council this year
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
