*/
Contract – Terms. The defendant company entered into a sale and purchase agreement (SPA) to sell or procure the sale of businesses and related assets, including a property, to three companies, including the claimant company. Under the SPA, the property was to be transferred to the claimant, but in the event, the claimant acquired a ten year lease in respect of it. The SPA contained environmental provisions, by which defendant agreed to indemnify the claimant and others in relation to environmental matters. The claimant sought a declaration as to whether, on the true construction of the SPA, it had a claim against the defendant, under the indemnity clause in the SPA, simply by virtue of the presence of hazardous substances at the property. The Chancery Division dismissed the claim, ruling that the claimant did not have a claim unless it could establish that it was liable to some third party for all sums payable to, or by reason of the directions or order of, any authority or agency responsible for compliance with environmental laws.
Contract – Terms. The defendant company entered into a sale and purchase agreement (SPA) to sell or procure the sale of businesses and related assets, including a property, to three companies, including the claimant company. Under the SPA, the property was to be transferred to the claimant, but in the event, the claimant acquired a ten year lease in respect of it. The SPA contained environmental provisions, by which defendant agreed to indemnify the claimant and others in relation to environmental matters. The claimant sought a declaration as to whether, on the true construction of the SPA, it had a claim against the defendant, under the indemnity clause in the SPA, simply by virtue of the presence of hazardous substances at the property. The Chancery Division dismissed the claim, ruling that the claimant did not have a claim unless it could establish that it was liable to some third party for all sums payable to, or by reason of the directions or order of, any authority or agency responsible for compliance with environmental laws.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
