Building – Contract. The claimant local authority entered into a contract with the defendant, which contained provisions governing the defendant's entitlement to make applications for interim payments. The authority sought declarations that: (i) application 21 was invalid and that the adjudicator's decision in respect of it was wrong; and (ii) no money was due under application 22. The Technology and Construction Court held that application 21 was not valid, that the adjudicator's decision could not stand and that the authority was entitled to the declaration sought. Further, it was entitled to the declaration sought as to application 22.