*/
Landlord and tenant – Assignment of lease. The defendants had leased premises from the claimant company. The defendants wished to leave the premises and assign the lease to a third party (TCA). TCA moved in to the premises and paid the rent. The defendants signed a deed of transfer and left it with their solicitor, who also acted for TCA. When TCA left the premises, the claimant sought payment of rent from the defendants and the defendants counterclaimed for a declaration was no longer vested in them following its assignment to TCA. The Recorder held that there had never been an effective assignment of the lease, that the claimant was not estopped from asserting that the defendants had remained its tenants and that the claimant was not precluded from asserting that the defendants were liable under the covenants contained in the lease. Further, he found that there the parties had never acted upon any common assumption that TCA had been assignee. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the defendants' appeal on the ground that, on the facts as found by the Recorder, his conclusions were unassailable.
Landlord and tenant – Assignment of lease. The defendants had leased premises from the claimant company. The defendants wished to leave the premises and assign the lease to a third party (TCA). TCA moved in to the premises and paid the rent. The defendants signed a deed of transfer and left it with their solicitor, who also acted for TCA. When TCA left the premises, the claimant sought payment of rent from the defendants and the defendants counterclaimed for a declaration was no longer vested in them following its assignment to TCA. The Recorder held that there had never been an effective assignment of the lease, that the claimant was not estopped from asserting that the defendants had remained its tenants and that the claimant was not precluded from asserting that the defendants were liable under the covenants contained in the lease. Further, he found that there the parties had never acted upon any common assumption that TCA had been assignee. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the defendants' appeal on the ground that, on the facts as found by the Recorder, his conclusions were unassailable.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Is the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office process fit for purpose? Women barristers’ experiences of bullying are not being reported or, if they are, they are not making it through the system, says Tana Adkin KC
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
