*/
Patent – Infringement. The Patents Court considered a claim for infringement of a patent concerning milling cutting tools for high feed face milling. The court held that, on the evidence, two inserts made by the defendant company did not infringe the claimant company's patent. However, on the evidence, the defendant's counterclaim for obviousness would succeed, since the claimant's patent lacked inventive step in the light of the prior art.
Patent – Infringement. The Patents Court considered a claim for infringement of a patent concerning milling cutting tools for high feed face milling. The court held that, on the evidence, two inserts made by the defendant company did not infringe the claimant company's patent. However, on the evidence, the defendant's counterclaim for obviousness would succeed, since the claimant's patent lacked inventive step in the light of the prior art.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
By Kem Kemal, CEO, Henry Dannell
By BSK Financial Planning
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Kick off your career at the Bar Council’s Pupillage Fair this October – it’s one of the most valuable opportunities for aspiring barristers, says Amelia Clegg
Join us on Saturday 21 November 2026 at Leeds Beckett University and see for yourself why the North continues to be an exceptional place to build a career at the Bar
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
