*/
Cohabitation – Unmarried couple. The proceedings concerned the entitlement of the claimant to provision from the deceased's estate. She had lived with the deceased for some time. The court determined, as a preliminary issue, that she was covered by the Provision for Family and Dependants Act 1975. The claimants appealed against that finding. The Chancery Division held that, on the evidence, the court had been entitled to come to that conclusion.
Cohabitation – Unmarried couple. The proceedings concerned the entitlement of the claimant to provision from the deceased's estate. She had lived with the deceased for some time. The court determined, as a preliminary issue, that she was covered by the Provision for Family and Dependants Act 1975. The claimants appealed against that finding. The Chancery Division held that, on the evidence, the court had been entitled to come to that conclusion.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
