*/
European Union – Transport. The present proceedings between Mr Glatzel and Freistaat Bayern concerned the decision by which Mr Glatzel had been refused a driving licence for vehicles in categories C1 and C1E, as defined by Directive (EC) 2006/126 (the Directive), on the ground that the visual acuity in his worse eye did not reach the minimum level required in point 6.4 of Annex III to that directive. Following a request for the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court) to make a preliminary ruling on the compatibility of point 6.4 of the Directive with arts 20, 21(1) and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union concerning the minimum standards relating to the physical fitness to drive a motor vehicle as regards visual acuity, the Court decided that consideration of that issue did not reveal any information capable of affecting the validity of point 6.4 of Annex III to the Directive.
European Union – Transport. The present proceedings between Mr Glatzel and Freistaat Bayern concerned the decision by which Mr Glatzel had been refused a driving licence for vehicles in categories C1 and C1E, as defined by Directive (EC) 2006/126 (the Directive), on the ground that the visual acuity in his worse eye did not reach the minimum level required in point 6.4 of Annex III to that directive. Following a request for the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court) to make a preliminary ruling on the compatibility of point 6.4 of the Directive with arts 20, 21(1) and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union concerning the minimum standards relating to the physical fitness to drive a motor vehicle as regards visual acuity, the Court decided that consideration of that issue did not reveal any information capable of affecting the validity of point 6.4 of Annex III to the Directive.
The profession has already tackled many uncertainties and risks
From cash to crypto, would you know where to start? Fleet Street Wealth’s Managing Director, Julian Morgan, advised delegates at the 2021 Annual Bar and Young Bar Conference
Harriet Challenger explains what you need to know about Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) testing and how to get the most conclusive insight into an individual’s drinking behaviour
How seriously should barristers’ chambers take the threat of cyberattack and how can they best protect themselves? Doug Hargrove offers some expert advice
With a mandate to advance best practice in crypto fraud cases and investigations, and improve recovery outcomes for victims, CFAAR (the Crypto Fraud and Asset Recovery network) founders Nick Price and Aidan Larkin discuss plans for the new network
Q&A with Carmel King of Grant Thornton UK LLP’s Insolvency and Asset Recovery practice
Mary Prior QC meets the founders of BDABar, Konstantina Nouka and James Ekin, who are determined toimprove accessibility, support and inclusivity at the Bar, and dismantle the barriers that disabled aspiring barristers face and how we perceive their disabilities
As we face 2022, the profession feels restless, the job feels relentless but we are in good hands: our new yet seasoned leader talks to Joanna Hardy-Susskind about his concerns and ambitions for the Bar, and how we protect this truly precious, national asset
May the odds be ever in your favour, writes Emma Fielding... A follow-up to Ishan Kolhatkars article (and the Twitter debate it sparked) on how to solve the problem of pupillage supply and demand
Harriet Challenger explains what you need to know about Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) testing and how to get the most conclusive insight into an individuals drinking behaviour
This is our stand up moment: Barbara Mills QC and Simon Regis on the landmark reports key findings and what the Bar must do to remove the systemic obstacles faced by many barristers from ethnic minority communities
0c2ef654-4f74-49bf-a3f2-36f7a32da6d9.tmb-carlisting.jpg?sfvrsn=398241a4_1){kind=logo}