*/
Tort – Wrongful interference with goods. The defendant mortgagee executed a warrant for possession in respect of the claimant mortgagor's property. The claimant brought a claim for damages against the defendant in respect of its disposal of chattels which she had left behind at the property. The Chancery Division, in determining a preliminary issue, held that, taking account of exceptional and egregious circumstances of the case, the defendant's conduct had been right and reasonable. The defendant was not liable in damages to the claimant or any of the other owners of chattels left on the property.
Tort – Wrongful interference with goods. The defendant mortgagee executed a warrant for possession in respect of the claimant mortgagor's property. The claimant brought a claim for damages against the defendant in respect of its disposal of chattels which she had left behind at the property. The Chancery Division, in determining a preliminary issue, held that, taking account of exceptional and egregious circumstances of the case, the defendant's conduct had been right and reasonable. The defendant was not liable in damages to the claimant or any of the other owners of chattels left on the property.
Efforts continue on gender equality, support for the Bar, meaningful reform for the sector and advocating for the rule of law
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Leading drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Beatson Cancer Charity in Glasgow as part of its Giving Back campaign
Girls Human Rights Festival 2025: a global gathering for change
Exclusive Q&A with Henry Dannell
