*/
Vexatious proceedings – Employment tribunal. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) granted the application by the Attorney General for an order pursuant to s 33 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 restricting the respondent from bringing further vexatious proceedings. The EAT found that 30 claims and numerous applications brought by the respondent in the employment tribunal had almost all been weak or hopeless and had been conducted vexatiously. The EAT was satisfied that it was necessary to make the order sought for an indefinite period.
Vexatious proceedings – Employment tribunal. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) granted the application by the Attorney General for an order pursuant to s 33 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 restricting the respondent from bringing further vexatious proceedings. The EAT found that 30 claims and numerous applications brought by the respondent in the employment tribunal had almost all been weak or hopeless and had been conducted vexatiously. The EAT was satisfied that it was necessary to make the order sought for an indefinite period.
Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights some of the key achievements at the Bar Council this year
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
