Yusuf v Yusuf and others; Yusuf and another v Yusuf and another

Company – Shares. The Chancery Division made rulings in a dispute concerning a family-owned property company. Among other things, a trust document of 2003 did not demonstrate an intention to create a trust at the time that it had been signed, but only an intention to sign some future document or documents, which appeared to have never been prepared. Further, the affairs of the company had been carried out in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the petitioners.