Tikka v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Immigration – Leave to remain. The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (the UT) erred in law in having proceeded on the basis that the suitability criteria for curtailment of leave and for re-entry were different, whereas they were, in fact, the same, and that error had been material. Accordingly, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the appellant's appeal against the UT's refusal of his appeal against the curtailment of his leave to remain based on art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Category: