Liddle (on his behalf and on behalf of Mary Liddle pursuant to the Order under CPR Part 19.8 of 4 July 2018) and others v Liddle (on his own behalf, as personal representative of David William Liddle Deceased and on behalf of Edith Winifred Liddle pur

Partnership – Dissolution. In order to make a valuation clause in the family farming partnership agreement workable, the court had to read in amendments so that so that it was not requiring the Continuing Partners in the partnership to pay unknown sums. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held it was necessary to decide when the purchase price was ascertained for the purposes of cl 13 and that was the date on which the accounts had been produced by the accountants.