Employment – Unfair dismissal. The employment tribunal had erred in refusing orders for reinstatement or re-engagement in respect of the first respondent, but not in respect of the second respondent, because the second respondent was not a successor employer, within the meaning of s 235 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. So held the Employment Appeal Tribunal in allowing the first respondent's appeal only. The issue of re-employment was remitted to a fresh tribunal.