Insurance – Contract of insurance. The claimant printing company was successful in its claim against the defendant insurance company, following the breaking-down of a printer at the claimant's premises, which caused loss and damage. The Technology and Construction Court held that the most obvious explanation for the damage to the press was a subsidence event, which was not excluded by the insurance policy between the parties. The claimant was entitled to damages for property damage and business interruption, coming to a total of £833,583.07.