Local authority – Disabled persons. The First-tier Tribunal's (FTT) decision had involved an error on a point of law because it had made inadequate findings about the special educational provision required to meet M's special educational needs or, alternatively, had given inadequate reasons for the findings it had made. Accordingly, the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) allowed the appellants' appeal against the FTT's decision, upholding the defendant local authority's decision that M no longer required the additionality provided via an education, health and care plan.