Ardawa v Uppal and another

Bankruptcy – Petition. Although the district judge had erred in making a retrospective order for substituted service of a bankruptcy petition issued by the first respondent wife, all the indications were that the appellant husband had been deliberately seeking to evade service. Accordingly, the Chancery Division, save as regards setting aside the order for substituted service, dismissed the husband's appeal against the bankruptcy order arising from non-payment of costs orders made against him in divorce proceedings.

Category: