*/
Criminal solicitors failed in their attempt to halt the Ministry of Justice’s plans to press ahead with the introduction of a two-tier contracting model for criminal defence work.
Dismissing an appeal against the reforms by the Law Society, the London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association and the Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association, the Court of Appeal gave the go-ahead for the process that will cut the number of contracts from around 1,600 to 527.
The groups fear that the move will drive many firms out of business, create advice deserts and lead to a fall in standards of representation and a rise in miscarriages of justice.
The Law Society President, Andrew Caplen, said: “The Court of Appeal decision is a devastating blow. We remain concerned that vulnerable people may not be able to obtain legal representation if they are accused of wrongdoing.”
He confirmed that Chancery Lane had taken the “difficult” decision not to seek to continue the fight in the Supreme Court following advice from counsel that the judgment was “robust” and an appeal unlikely to succeed.
The tender process, which had been suspended until the judgment, reopened and ends on 5 May. If introduced, the new contracts will run from January 2016.
Solicitors have planned meetings to consider their next move, while the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) is also canvassing its membership over how best to support to solicitors.
CBA Chairman, Tony Cross QC, appealed to his members to campaign on behalf of their solicitor colleagues. The next steps, he said, will be informed by the outcome of the General Election.
If elected, the Labour Party has promised to scrap the new tendering plans and review the second tranche of 8.75% fee cuts, due to be introduced in the summer.
Responding to the 2014 consultation on the changes, the Bar Council warned that the proposals would result in “a massive, and irreversible, dislocation of the market for criminal litigators, with many firms and individuals leaving criminal litigation for no apparent benefit”.
Dismissing an appeal against the reforms by the Law Society, the London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association and the Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association, the Court of Appeal gave the go-ahead for the process that will cut the number of contracts from around 1,600 to 527.
The groups fear that the move will drive many firms out of business, create advice deserts and lead to a fall in standards of representation and a rise in miscarriages of justice.
The Law Society President, Andrew Caplen, said: “The Court of Appeal decision is a devastating blow. We remain concerned that vulnerable people may not be able to obtain legal representation if they are accused of wrongdoing.”
He confirmed that Chancery Lane had taken the “difficult” decision not to seek to continue the fight in the Supreme Court following advice from counsel that the judgment was “robust” and an appeal unlikely to succeed.
The tender process, which had been suspended until the judgment, reopened and ends on 5 May. If introduced, the new contracts will run from January 2016.
Solicitors have planned meetings to consider their next move, while the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) is also canvassing its membership over how best to support to solicitors.
CBA Chairman, Tony Cross QC, appealed to his members to campaign on behalf of their solicitor colleagues. The next steps, he said, will be informed by the outcome of the General Election.
If elected, the Labour Party has promised to scrap the new tendering plans and review the second tranche of 8.75% fee cuts, due to be introduced in the summer.
Responding to the 2014 consultation on the changes, the Bar Council warned that the proposals would result in “a massive, and irreversible, dislocation of the market for criminal litigators, with many firms and individuals leaving criminal litigation for no apparent benefit”.
Criminal solicitors failed in their attempt to halt the Ministry of Justice’s plans to press ahead with the introduction of a two-tier contracting model for criminal defence work.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
