*/
Courts/judiciary
Judgments must be made clearer and more concise – or public confidence in the justice system could be undermined, the President of the Supreme Court has warned.
Lord Neuberger, speaking at the first annual BAILLI lecture (20 November 2012), said that judgments must speak as clearly as possible to the public, particularly given the rise in self-represented litigants.
“The steps to increased clarity are not difficult,” said Neuberger, but “ingrained habit may take some effort to break”. Neuberger suggested two quick fixes to improve accessibility. First, to add a short summary at the start of each judgment sufficient to enable a non-lawyer to know the facts, the issues, and how and why they were resolved. Second, that judges should give a clear framework to longer judgments, such as a table of contents, a roadmap, and appropriate signposts throughout.
A more controversial suggestion was that judges should cut the length of their judgments. “Judges should weed out the otiose,” he said. “We should, for instance, remove unnecessary displays of learning, or what the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, recalls his history teacher marking on his essay, APK, anxious parade of knowledge.” Whilst not suggesting banning dissenting judgments, Neuberger proposed that they could be fewer, and shorter.
Lord Neuberger, speaking at the first annual BAILLI lecture (20 November 2012), said that judgments must speak as clearly as possible to the public, particularly given the rise in self-represented litigants.
“The steps to increased clarity are not difficult,” said Neuberger, but “ingrained habit may take some effort to break”. Neuberger suggested two quick fixes to improve accessibility. First, to add a short summary at the start of each judgment sufficient to enable a non-lawyer to know the facts, the issues, and how and why they were resolved. Second, that judges should give a clear framework to longer judgments, such as a table of contents, a roadmap, and appropriate signposts throughout.
A more controversial suggestion was that judges should cut the length of their judgments. “Judges should weed out the otiose,” he said. “We should, for instance, remove unnecessary displays of learning, or what the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, recalls his history teacher marking on his essay, APK, anxious parade of knowledge.” Whilst not suggesting banning dissenting judgments, Neuberger proposed that they could be fewer, and shorter.
Courts/judiciary
Judgments must be made clearer and more concise – or public confidence in the justice system could be undermined, the President of the Supreme Court has warned.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
