*/
Courts/judiciary
Judgments must be made clearer and more concise – or public confidence in the justice system could be undermined, the President of the Supreme Court has warned.
Lord Neuberger, speaking at the first annual BAILLI lecture (20 November 2012), said that judgments must speak as clearly as possible to the public, particularly given the rise in self-represented litigants.
“The steps to increased clarity are not difficult,” said Neuberger, but “ingrained habit may take some effort to break”. Neuberger suggested two quick fixes to improve accessibility. First, to add a short summary at the start of each judgment sufficient to enable a non-lawyer to know the facts, the issues, and how and why they were resolved. Second, that judges should give a clear framework to longer judgments, such as a table of contents, a roadmap, and appropriate signposts throughout.
A more controversial suggestion was that judges should cut the length of their judgments. “Judges should weed out the otiose,” he said. “We should, for instance, remove unnecessary displays of learning, or what the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, recalls his history teacher marking on his essay, APK, anxious parade of knowledge.” Whilst not suggesting banning dissenting judgments, Neuberger proposed that they could be fewer, and shorter.
Lord Neuberger, speaking at the first annual BAILLI lecture (20 November 2012), said that judgments must speak as clearly as possible to the public, particularly given the rise in self-represented litigants.
“The steps to increased clarity are not difficult,” said Neuberger, but “ingrained habit may take some effort to break”. Neuberger suggested two quick fixes to improve accessibility. First, to add a short summary at the start of each judgment sufficient to enable a non-lawyer to know the facts, the issues, and how and why they were resolved. Second, that judges should give a clear framework to longer judgments, such as a table of contents, a roadmap, and appropriate signposts throughout.
A more controversial suggestion was that judges should cut the length of their judgments. “Judges should weed out the otiose,” he said. “We should, for instance, remove unnecessary displays of learning, or what the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, recalls his history teacher marking on his essay, APK, anxious parade of knowledge.” Whilst not suggesting banning dissenting judgments, Neuberger proposed that they could be fewer, and shorter.
Courts/judiciary
Judgments must be made clearer and more concise – or public confidence in the justice system could be undermined, the President of the Supreme Court has warned.
The Bar Council will press for investment in justice at party conferences, the Chancellor’s Budget and Spending Review
Equip yourself for your new career at the Bar
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth explores some key steps to take when starting out as a barrister in order to secure your financial future
Millicent Wild of 5 Essex Chambers describes her pupillage experience
Drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Juno Women’s Aid in Nottingham as part of its Giving Back campaign
Casedo explains how to hit the ground running on your next case with a four-step plan to transform the way you work
If you are in/about to start pupillage, you will soon be facing the pupillage stage assessment in professional ethics. Jane Hutton and Patrick Ryan outline exam format and tactics
In a two-part opinion series, James Onalaja considers the International Criminal Court Prosecutor’s requests for arrest warrants in the controversial Israel-Palestine situation
To mark the fifth anniversary of the Bar Standards Board’s Race Equality Taskforce, Dee Sekar reflects on key milestones, the role of regulation in race equality, and calls for views on the upcoming equality rules consultation
Daniel Barnett serves up a host of summer shows
How to start a podcast? Former High Court judge Sir Nicholas Mostyn explains how he joined forces with Lord Falconer and Baroness Helena Kennedy KC to develop and present their weekly legal podcast
