*/
Check the factual basis for the appeal or risk criticism and action by the court, the Bar Council’s Ethics Committee has warned.
In a note, Criminal Appeals – Duties to the Court to Make Enquiries, the committee issued guidance to new barristers instructed in criminal appeals who were not trial counsel.
It sets out a checklist and advises barristers to make inquiries of the legal representatives who acted at the trial in order to ensure that the factual basis for each ground of appeal is correct, and to seek other objective independent evidence to substantiate those facts.
This must be done, says the Bar Council document, ‘whether or not the grounds of appeal may make express or implied criticisms of those former legal representatives’.
Committee chairman, Andrew Walker QC, said: ‘In several recent decisions, the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division has clarified and emphasised the importance of some particular duties to the court when fresh counsel are instructed to represent a convicted defendant in a criminal appeal.
‘When the Court of Appeal highlights an issue such as this, you don’t ignore it. Barristers must not get caught out’.
He said: ‘The Court of Appeal is clearly concerned that in some cases, appeals are being advanced on grounds which turn out to be factually wrong, and has indicated that it will take a strict line with those who do not comply with their duties in this respect.
‘In extreme cases, this could even include referral to the regulator,’ he said.
Check the factual basis for the appeal or risk criticism and action by the court, the Bar Council’s Ethics Committee has warned.
In a note, Criminal Appeals – Duties to the Court to Make Enquiries, the committee issued guidance to new barristers instructed in criminal appeals who were not trial counsel.
It sets out a checklist and advises barristers to make inquiries of the legal representatives who acted at the trial in order to ensure that the factual basis for each ground of appeal is correct, and to seek other objective independent evidence to substantiate those facts.
This must be done, says the Bar Council document, ‘whether or not the grounds of appeal may make express or implied criticisms of those former legal representatives’.
Committee chairman, Andrew Walker QC, said: ‘In several recent decisions, the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division has clarified and emphasised the importance of some particular duties to the court when fresh counsel are instructed to represent a convicted defendant in a criminal appeal.
‘When the Court of Appeal highlights an issue such as this, you don’t ignore it. Barristers must not get caught out’.
He said: ‘The Court of Appeal is clearly concerned that in some cases, appeals are being advanced on grounds which turn out to be factually wrong, and has indicated that it will take a strict line with those who do not comply with their duties in this respect.
‘In extreme cases, this could even include referral to the regulator,’ he said.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
By Kem Kemal, CEO, Henry Dannell
By BSK Financial Planning
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Kick off your career at the Bar Council’s Pupillage Fair this October – it’s one of the most valuable opportunities for aspiring barristers, says Amelia Clegg
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
The Ministry of Justice will match-fund up to 100 criminal pupillages, with grants available to criminal chambers across England and Wales. Similar to the COIC scheme, the grants will match-fund pupillages additional to those otherwise offered without government funding
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
