*/
Check the factual basis for the appeal or risk criticism and action by the court, the Bar Council’s Ethics Committee has warned.
In a note, Criminal Appeals – Duties to the Court to Make Enquiries, the committee issued guidance to new barristers instructed in criminal appeals who were not trial counsel.
It sets out a checklist and advises barristers to make inquiries of the legal representatives who acted at the trial in order to ensure that the factual basis for each ground of appeal is correct, and to seek other objective independent evidence to substantiate those facts.
This must be done, says the Bar Council document, ‘whether or not the grounds of appeal may make express or implied criticisms of those former legal representatives’.
Committee chairman, Andrew Walker QC, said: ‘In several recent decisions, the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division has clarified and emphasised the importance of some particular duties to the court when fresh counsel are instructed to represent a convicted defendant in a criminal appeal.
‘When the Court of Appeal highlights an issue such as this, you don’t ignore it. Barristers must not get caught out’.
He said: ‘The Court of Appeal is clearly concerned that in some cases, appeals are being advanced on grounds which turn out to be factually wrong, and has indicated that it will take a strict line with those who do not comply with their duties in this respect.
‘In extreme cases, this could even include referral to the regulator,’ he said.
Check the factual basis for the appeal or risk criticism and action by the court, the Bar Council’s Ethics Committee has warned.
In a note, Criminal Appeals – Duties to the Court to Make Enquiries, the committee issued guidance to new barristers instructed in criminal appeals who were not trial counsel.
It sets out a checklist and advises barristers to make inquiries of the legal representatives who acted at the trial in order to ensure that the factual basis for each ground of appeal is correct, and to seek other objective independent evidence to substantiate those facts.
This must be done, says the Bar Council document, ‘whether or not the grounds of appeal may make express or implied criticisms of those former legal representatives’.
Committee chairman, Andrew Walker QC, said: ‘In several recent decisions, the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division has clarified and emphasised the importance of some particular duties to the court when fresh counsel are instructed to represent a convicted defendant in a criminal appeal.
‘When the Court of Appeal highlights an issue such as this, you don’t ignore it. Barristers must not get caught out’.
He said: ‘The Court of Appeal is clearly concerned that in some cases, appeals are being advanced on grounds which turn out to be factually wrong, and has indicated that it will take a strict line with those who do not comply with their duties in this respect.
‘In extreme cases, this could even include referral to the regulator,’ he said.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
Kindness Ambassadors – coming to a courtroom near you! Valerie Charbit, Nicola Shannon KC and Professor Robin Banerjee update readers on the second phase of the project examining, and promoting, the impact of kindness and how it can fit into an adversarial system
