*/
The Legal Services Commission has toned down its plans for complex criminal cases, following sustained lobbying.
The Commission’s new proposals for very high cost cases (VHCCs), launched in December, drop plans for hourly rates and propose a fixed fee element for the core tasks, with the rest of the pre-trial preparation fee subject to negotiation. There is no longer a requirement for advocates to join a panel, or to be part of a litigator’s team when they bid. Litigators will negotiate how much work they carry out in a contract, and cases will be structured around a series of core litigation tasks.
The proposals were drafted by a steering group including the Bar Council, Ministry of Justice, Criminal Bar Association, Law Society, Crown Prosecution Service and Legal Services Commission.
The Bar Council and Criminal Bar Association have welcomed the consultation paper. Tim Dutton QC, 2008 Bar Council Chairman, commented that the “robust scheme” was “testament to the professionalism and goodwill which all involved have shown”.
Barristers largely boycotted the VHCC panel set up last January, forcing the Commission to revise its plans, and the revised scheme set up in its place is due to expire in July 2009.
Tim Dutton QC said: “The proposed scheme should provide a fair payment mechanism, which reflects the complexity of the cases in question, and the concomitant expertise required of those advocates who conduct them. It will deliver within budget.”
The consultation will run until 30 January 2009. A separate consultation will run in March to consider the details of the advocate’s contract; thought to be case-specific.
The Commission’s new proposals for very high cost cases (VHCCs), launched in December, drop plans for hourly rates and propose a fixed fee element for the core tasks, with the rest of the pre-trial preparation fee subject to negotiation. There is no longer a requirement for advocates to join a panel, or to be part of a litigator’s team when they bid. Litigators will negotiate how much work they carry out in a contract, and cases will be structured around a series of core litigation tasks.
The proposals were drafted by a steering group including the Bar Council, Ministry of Justice, Criminal Bar Association, Law Society, Crown Prosecution Service and Legal Services Commission.
The Bar Council and Criminal Bar Association have welcomed the consultation paper. Tim Dutton QC, 2008 Bar Council Chairman, commented that the “robust scheme” was “testament to the professionalism and goodwill which all involved have shown”.
Barristers largely boycotted the VHCC panel set up last January, forcing the Commission to revise its plans, and the revised scheme set up in its place is due to expire in July 2009.
Tim Dutton QC said: “The proposed scheme should provide a fair payment mechanism, which reflects the complexity of the cases in question, and the concomitant expertise required of those advocates who conduct them. It will deliver within budget.”
The consultation will run until 30 January 2009. A separate consultation will run in March to consider the details of the advocate’s contract; thought to be case-specific.
The Legal Services Commission has toned down its plans for complex criminal cases, following sustained lobbying.
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
