*/
The Legal Services Commission has toned down its plans for complex criminal cases, following sustained lobbying.
The Commission’s new proposals for very high cost cases (VHCCs), launched in December, drop plans for hourly rates and propose a fixed fee element for the core tasks, with the rest of the pre-trial preparation fee subject to negotiation. There is no longer a requirement for advocates to join a panel, or to be part of a litigator’s team when they bid. Litigators will negotiate how much work they carry out in a contract, and cases will be structured around a series of core litigation tasks.
The proposals were drafted by a steering group including the Bar Council, Ministry of Justice, Criminal Bar Association, Law Society, Crown Prosecution Service and Legal Services Commission.
The Bar Council and Criminal Bar Association have welcomed the consultation paper. Tim Dutton QC, 2008 Bar Council Chairman, commented that the “robust scheme” was “testament to the professionalism and goodwill which all involved have shown”.
Barristers largely boycotted the VHCC panel set up last January, forcing the Commission to revise its plans, and the revised scheme set up in its place is due to expire in July 2009.
Tim Dutton QC said: “The proposed scheme should provide a fair payment mechanism, which reflects the complexity of the cases in question, and the concomitant expertise required of those advocates who conduct them. It will deliver within budget.”
The consultation will run until 30 January 2009. A separate consultation will run in March to consider the details of the advocate’s contract; thought to be case-specific.
The Commission’s new proposals for very high cost cases (VHCCs), launched in December, drop plans for hourly rates and propose a fixed fee element for the core tasks, with the rest of the pre-trial preparation fee subject to negotiation. There is no longer a requirement for advocates to join a panel, or to be part of a litigator’s team when they bid. Litigators will negotiate how much work they carry out in a contract, and cases will be structured around a series of core litigation tasks.
The proposals were drafted by a steering group including the Bar Council, Ministry of Justice, Criminal Bar Association, Law Society, Crown Prosecution Service and Legal Services Commission.
The Bar Council and Criminal Bar Association have welcomed the consultation paper. Tim Dutton QC, 2008 Bar Council Chairman, commented that the “robust scheme” was “testament to the professionalism and goodwill which all involved have shown”.
Barristers largely boycotted the VHCC panel set up last January, forcing the Commission to revise its plans, and the revised scheme set up in its place is due to expire in July 2009.
Tim Dutton QC said: “The proposed scheme should provide a fair payment mechanism, which reflects the complexity of the cases in question, and the concomitant expertise required of those advocates who conduct them. It will deliver within budget.”
The consultation will run until 30 January 2009. A separate consultation will run in March to consider the details of the advocate’s contract; thought to be case-specific.
The Legal Services Commission has toned down its plans for complex criminal cases, following sustained lobbying.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
Why were some Caribbean nations given such dramatically different constitutional frameworks when they gained independence from the UK? Dr Leonardo Raznovich examines the controversial savings clause
