*/
The Lord Chancellor announced that the discount rate applied to personal injury compensation payments will fall from 2.5% to 0.75%.
The rate determines how much payments are adjusted by to reflect the interest claimants can expect to earn by investing them. The percentage is linked in law to returns on the lowest risk investments, typically index-linked gilts.
Liz Truss said the change reflected the significant fall in interest rates since the rate was last set in 2001.
The Ministry of Justice said the law makes clear claimants must be treated as risk averse investors, reflecting the fact that they are financially dependent on this lump sum, often for long periods or their life.
Compensation awards using the rate should put the claimant in the same financial position had they not been injured, including loss of future earnings and care costs.
Truss said: ‘The law is absolutely clear – as Lord Chancellor, I must make sure the right rate is set to compensate claimants. I am clear that this is the only legally acceptable rate I can set.’
Claimant lawyers welcomed the move that will give victims greater sums. But Truss warned it will have a significant impact on the insurance industry and a knock-on effect on public services with large personal injury liabilities – particularly the NHS.
Insurers reacted by seeking an urgent meeting with the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Hammond, to ask him to intervene and reverse the change.
The Lord Chancellor announced that the discount rate applied to personal injury compensation payments will fall from 2.5% to 0.75%.
The rate determines how much payments are adjusted by to reflect the interest claimants can expect to earn by investing them. The percentage is linked in law to returns on the lowest risk investments, typically index-linked gilts.
Liz Truss said the change reflected the significant fall in interest rates since the rate was last set in 2001.
The Ministry of Justice said the law makes clear claimants must be treated as risk averse investors, reflecting the fact that they are financially dependent on this lump sum, often for long periods or their life.
Compensation awards using the rate should put the claimant in the same financial position had they not been injured, including loss of future earnings and care costs.
Truss said: ‘The law is absolutely clear – as Lord Chancellor, I must make sure the right rate is set to compensate claimants. I am clear that this is the only legally acceptable rate I can set.’
Claimant lawyers welcomed the move that will give victims greater sums. But Truss warned it will have a significant impact on the insurance industry and a knock-on effect on public services with large personal injury liabilities – particularly the NHS.
Insurers reacted by seeking an urgent meeting with the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Hammond, to ask him to intervene and reverse the change.
Justice system requires urgent attention and next steps on the Harman Review
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
Many disabled barristers face entrenched obstacles to KC appointment – both procedural and systemic, writes Diego F Soto-Miranda
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial Competition has boosted the skills, knowledge and confidence of tens of thousands of state school students – as sixth-form teacher Conor Duffy and Young Citizens’ Akasa Pradhan report
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal system centre stage once more. Will it galvanise change? asks Rehna Azim
