*/
The Lord Chancellor announced that the discount rate applied to personal injury compensation payments will fall from 2.5% to 0.75%.
The rate determines how much payments are adjusted by to reflect the interest claimants can expect to earn by investing them. The percentage is linked in law to returns on the lowest risk investments, typically index-linked gilts.
Liz Truss said the change reflected the significant fall in interest rates since the rate was last set in 2001.
The Ministry of Justice said the law makes clear claimants must be treated as risk averse investors, reflecting the fact that they are financially dependent on this lump sum, often for long periods or their life.
Compensation awards using the rate should put the claimant in the same financial position had they not been injured, including loss of future earnings and care costs.
Truss said: ‘The law is absolutely clear – as Lord Chancellor, I must make sure the right rate is set to compensate claimants. I am clear that this is the only legally acceptable rate I can set.’
Claimant lawyers welcomed the move that will give victims greater sums. But Truss warned it will have a significant impact on the insurance industry and a knock-on effect on public services with large personal injury liabilities – particularly the NHS.
Insurers reacted by seeking an urgent meeting with the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Hammond, to ask him to intervene and reverse the change.
The Lord Chancellor announced that the discount rate applied to personal injury compensation payments will fall from 2.5% to 0.75%.
The rate determines how much payments are adjusted by to reflect the interest claimants can expect to earn by investing them. The percentage is linked in law to returns on the lowest risk investments, typically index-linked gilts.
Liz Truss said the change reflected the significant fall in interest rates since the rate was last set in 2001.
The Ministry of Justice said the law makes clear claimants must be treated as risk averse investors, reflecting the fact that they are financially dependent on this lump sum, often for long periods or their life.
Compensation awards using the rate should put the claimant in the same financial position had they not been injured, including loss of future earnings and care costs.
Truss said: ‘The law is absolutely clear – as Lord Chancellor, I must make sure the right rate is set to compensate claimants. I am clear that this is the only legally acceptable rate I can set.’
Claimant lawyers welcomed the move that will give victims greater sums. But Truss warned it will have a significant impact on the insurance industry and a knock-on effect on public services with large personal injury liabilities – particularly the NHS.
Insurers reacted by seeking an urgent meeting with the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Hammond, to ask him to intervene and reverse the change.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Are you ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC explains the biggest change since HMRC launched self-assessment more than 30 years ago... and its impact on the Bar
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC present their best buys for this holiday season
Marking one year since a Bar disciplinary tribunal dismissed all charges against her, Dr Charlotte Proudman discusses the experience, her formative years and next steps. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Pointillism, radical politics and social conscience. Review by Stephen Cragg KC
