*/
The Lord Chancellor announced that the discount rate applied to personal injury compensation payments will fall from 2.5% to 0.75%.
The rate determines how much payments are adjusted by to reflect the interest claimants can expect to earn by investing them. The percentage is linked in law to returns on the lowest risk investments, typically index-linked gilts.
Liz Truss said the change reflected the significant fall in interest rates since the rate was last set in 2001.
The Ministry of Justice said the law makes clear claimants must be treated as risk averse investors, reflecting the fact that they are financially dependent on this lump sum, often for long periods or their life.
Compensation awards using the rate should put the claimant in the same financial position had they not been injured, including loss of future earnings and care costs.
Truss said: ‘The law is absolutely clear – as Lord Chancellor, I must make sure the right rate is set to compensate claimants. I am clear that this is the only legally acceptable rate I can set.’
Claimant lawyers welcomed the move that will give victims greater sums. But Truss warned it will have a significant impact on the insurance industry and a knock-on effect on public services with large personal injury liabilities – particularly the NHS.
Insurers reacted by seeking an urgent meeting with the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Hammond, to ask him to intervene and reverse the change.
The Lord Chancellor announced that the discount rate applied to personal injury compensation payments will fall from 2.5% to 0.75%.
The rate determines how much payments are adjusted by to reflect the interest claimants can expect to earn by investing them. The percentage is linked in law to returns on the lowest risk investments, typically index-linked gilts.
Liz Truss said the change reflected the significant fall in interest rates since the rate was last set in 2001.
The Ministry of Justice said the law makes clear claimants must be treated as risk averse investors, reflecting the fact that they are financially dependent on this lump sum, often for long periods or their life.
Compensation awards using the rate should put the claimant in the same financial position had they not been injured, including loss of future earnings and care costs.
Truss said: ‘The law is absolutely clear – as Lord Chancellor, I must make sure the right rate is set to compensate claimants. I am clear that this is the only legally acceptable rate I can set.’
Claimant lawyers welcomed the move that will give victims greater sums. But Truss warned it will have a significant impact on the insurance industry and a knock-on effect on public services with large personal injury liabilities – particularly the NHS.
Insurers reacted by seeking an urgent meeting with the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Hammond, to ask him to intervene and reverse the change.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
In an era of patient-centred care and growing concern over misconduct in medical settings, why do women still lack the right to choose women consultants for examination and treatment? Charles Davey investigates
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
