*/
Ministers have reportedly called for Theresa May to sack the Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary Liz Truss after a series of mistakes and run-ins with the senior judiciary.
The Independent website reported that the change could see the Ministry of Justice broken up and the role of Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary split between two different ministers, but it said the government denied any such plan.
Truss came under an unprecedented attack from the outgoing Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas, in his final appearance before the Lords’ Constitution Committee.
He highlighted that she had ‘wrongly’ announced a national roll-out of reforms to enable adult complainants in rape cases to give pre-recorded evidence. The change in fact related to national implementation of the scheme for child witnesses, with a pilot scheme for adults due to commence.
Thomas said he had had to write to all judges explaining the Ministry’s mistake, which demonstrated its ‘complete failure to understand’ the issues around it.
He added: ‘That is the kind of thing that is very troubling. The Ministry of Justice is under-resourced. They do not have enough people who understand.’
He admonished Truss for failing to defend the judiciary in the face of media criticism following the High Court’s ruling over the Brexit process, in which he and two other judges were branded ‘Enemies of the People’. Thomas said he had been forced to seek police protection.
Truss said it was not for her to tell papers what to write, but Thomas said: ‘She was completely and absolutely wrong. And I am very disappointed. I can understand how the pressures were on in November but she has taken a position that is constitutionally, absolutely wrong.
‘It really is absolutely essential we have a Lord Chancellor who understands her constitutional duty. There is a difference between criticism and abuse, and I don’t think that that is understood.’
A report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments accused Truss of ‘overstepping her powers’ with a proposed hike to probate fees, which it said could be unlawful, and the Commons Justice Committee has raised concerns over her plans for prison reform.
Defending Truss, her predecessor Michael Gove told The Times newspaper she is an ‘asset to this government’ and a ‘reforming justice secretary whose changes are having to be made all on a tight budget’ and will inevitably attract criticism.
Ministers have reportedly called for Theresa May to sack the Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary Liz Truss after a series of mistakes and run-ins with the senior judiciary.
The Independent website reported that the change could see the Ministry of Justice broken up and the role of Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary split between two different ministers, but it said the government denied any such plan.
Truss came under an unprecedented attack from the outgoing Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas, in his final appearance before the Lords’ Constitution Committee.
He highlighted that she had ‘wrongly’ announced a national roll-out of reforms to enable adult complainants in rape cases to give pre-recorded evidence. The change in fact related to national implementation of the scheme for child witnesses, with a pilot scheme for adults due to commence.
Thomas said he had had to write to all judges explaining the Ministry’s mistake, which demonstrated its ‘complete failure to understand’ the issues around it.
He added: ‘That is the kind of thing that is very troubling. The Ministry of Justice is under-resourced. They do not have enough people who understand.’
He admonished Truss for failing to defend the judiciary in the face of media criticism following the High Court’s ruling over the Brexit process, in which he and two other judges were branded ‘Enemies of the People’. Thomas said he had been forced to seek police protection.
Truss said it was not for her to tell papers what to write, but Thomas said: ‘She was completely and absolutely wrong. And I am very disappointed. I can understand how the pressures were on in November but she has taken a position that is constitutionally, absolutely wrong.
‘It really is absolutely essential we have a Lord Chancellor who understands her constitutional duty. There is a difference between criticism and abuse, and I don’t think that that is understood.’
A report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments accused Truss of ‘overstepping her powers’ with a proposed hike to probate fees, which it said could be unlawful, and the Commons Justice Committee has raised concerns over her plans for prison reform.
Defending Truss, her predecessor Michael Gove told The Times newspaper she is an ‘asset to this government’ and a ‘reforming justice secretary whose changes are having to be made all on a tight budget’ and will inevitably attract criticism.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
Why were some Caribbean nations given such dramatically different constitutional frameworks when they gained independence from the UK? Dr Leonardo Raznovich examines the controversial savings clause
