*/
Sir James Munby called for new ‘problem-solving’ courts to deal with children caught up in family and criminal courts.
Speaking at the Howard League for Penal Reform, the President of the Family Division said that the Family Court should be expanded to include the Youth Court, with an emphasis on problem-solving rather on the criminal law.
He urged the Crown Prosecution Service to reconsider its prosecuting policy for children, but said: ‘I do not go so far as to suggest that age alone should immunise children from the appropriate application of the criminal law where there has been really serious offending.’
However, in less serious cases, he said it is legitimate to ask what advantage there is in invoking a criminal process in preference to a family court process, especially where the family court is already engaged in careful analysis of and planning for the child’s future.
He said there was an ‘urgent need’ to simplify what had become an ‘immensely complicated landscape’.
Sir James also said there needed to be ‘a fundamental re-balancing of the family court towards what ought to be its true role as a problem-solving court, engaging the therapeutic and other support systems that so many children and parents need’.
He said that in these ‘uniquely complex cases’, courts must grapple with the underlying problems and difficulties of the whole family. ‘So what we need is a problem-solving court for the whole family. Can a criminal court, can the Youth Court, satisfactorily fulfil that role? Is it not, in truth, a role better suited to a re-vamped family court with an enhanced jurisdiction?’
Sir James Munby called for new ‘problem-solving’ courts to deal with children caught up in family and criminal courts.
Speaking at the Howard League for Penal Reform, the President of the Family Division said that the Family Court should be expanded to include the Youth Court, with an emphasis on problem-solving rather on the criminal law.
He urged the Crown Prosecution Service to reconsider its prosecuting policy for children, but said: ‘I do not go so far as to suggest that age alone should immunise children from the appropriate application of the criminal law where there has been really serious offending.’
However, in less serious cases, he said it is legitimate to ask what advantage there is in invoking a criminal process in preference to a family court process, especially where the family court is already engaged in careful analysis of and planning for the child’s future.
He said there was an ‘urgent need’ to simplify what had become an ‘immensely complicated landscape’.
Sir James also said there needed to be ‘a fundamental re-balancing of the family court towards what ought to be its true role as a problem-solving court, engaging the therapeutic and other support systems that so many children and parents need’.
He said that in these ‘uniquely complex cases’, courts must grapple with the underlying problems and difficulties of the whole family. ‘So what we need is a problem-solving court for the whole family. Can a criminal court, can the Youth Court, satisfactorily fulfil that role? Is it not, in truth, a role better suited to a re-vamped family court with an enhanced jurisdiction?’
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
Kindness Ambassadors – coming to a courtroom near you! Valerie Charbit, Nicola Shannon KC and Professor Robin Banerjee update readers on the second phase of the project examining, and promoting, the impact of kindness and how it can fit into an adversarial system
