*/
Barristers are not obliged to speak to the media and must be wary of appearing to promote themselves when doing so, the Bar Council’s ethics committee has reiterated in an updated note.
The committee reminded barristers that since the removal of the prohibition in April 2013, they are permitted to talk to the media ‘generally and in respect of concluded litigation’ in which they acted, subject to their general professional duties.
But pointing to guidance from the Bar Standards Board (The BSB Handbook: gC22 and Media Comment Guidance), it noted that they are under ‘no obligation’ to do so and that it is not a legal service and does not form part of barristers’ duties to act in the best interests of any of their clients.
As such, it warned that barristers may not be insured against any consequences of expressing a personal opinion to the media. The BSB also reminded barristers of the risk of liability in contempt, defamation or malicious falsehood that can arise personally, or for the lay client.
Barristers were advised to consider the following before speaking to the press: the nature and type of proceedings; the stage proceedings have reached; the nature of the proposed comments; what information they are permitted to convey; whether they need the client’s consent; and the likelihood of prejudice arising from the comments.
They were reminded that their role is not to act as their client’s mouthpiece or to identify themselves personally with their client’s cause, and warned that in speaking to the media their motives for doing so may be called into question.
‘Even if this is not what you intend’ by speaking to the press, it warns, ‘you run the risk of appearing to promote your own interests over those of your client’.
Barristers are not obliged to speak to the media and must be wary of appearing to promote themselves when doing so, the Bar Council’s ethics committee has reiterated in an updated note.
The committee reminded barristers that since the removal of the prohibition in April 2013, they are permitted to talk to the media ‘generally and in respect of concluded litigation’ in which they acted, subject to their general professional duties.
But pointing to guidance from the Bar Standards Board (The BSB Handbook: gC22 and Media Comment Guidance), it noted that they are under ‘no obligation’ to do so and that it is not a legal service and does not form part of barristers’ duties to act in the best interests of any of their clients.
As such, it warned that barristers may not be insured against any consequences of expressing a personal opinion to the media. The BSB also reminded barristers of the risk of liability in contempt, defamation or malicious falsehood that can arise personally, or for the lay client.
Barristers were advised to consider the following before speaking to the press: the nature and type of proceedings; the stage proceedings have reached; the nature of the proposed comments; what information they are permitted to convey; whether they need the client’s consent; and the likelihood of prejudice arising from the comments.
They were reminded that their role is not to act as their client’s mouthpiece or to identify themselves personally with their client’s cause, and warned that in speaking to the media their motives for doing so may be called into question.
‘Even if this is not what you intend’ by speaking to the press, it warns, ‘you run the risk of appearing to promote your own interests over those of your client’.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
