*/
So, you’ve spent hours and hours perfecting your pupillage application forms and your reward at the end of it all is a 20-minute grilling. How do you prove yourself in such a short window?
This is included in the top tips from the Secret Barrister: see bit.ly/2UcJaE1. It is just not possible to anticipate every question or every argument that may be put to you. Do whatever it takes to get in the right frame of mind. I liked to be busy in the run-up to an interview so I didn’t dwell on things. Others like to clear their diaries. Whatever works for you.
Have an answer for the classic opening questions like ‘why do you want to be a barrister?’ and ‘why are you interested in commercial law?’. If your answer to either is ‘because I like money’, think of a better one. And, as criminal barrister Joanna Hardy recommends in a thread reproduced by Legal Cheek, make sure you know where the interview is and get there early.
As Katy Thorne QC, of Doughty Street Chambers told the Guardian recently, slowing things down will give you more thinking time and make sure your answer, when it comes, will be heard and remembered. You shouldn’t be afraid of a short silence while you gather your thoughts. It happens all the time in court and it can be very impressive if you have the confidence to do it.
I didn’t take up the opportunity of mock interviews when I was applying for pupillage and I think it showed. It’s much better to make your mistakes before you get into the room (or onto the Zoom call). Mock interviews are recommended by the pupillage teams at 5 Essex Court (@Pupillages) and Henderson Chambers (@HendersonPupils) and offered by the Inns of Court.
Barristers are people too (well, some of them). They like to see a candidate with something beyond the standard excellent academic results and extra-curricular activities. Even if you don’t have something quirky on your CV, the ‘what’s your favourite biscuit?’ genre of questions provides an opportunity. While these are rarely decisive of who gets an offer, an answer that shows a bit of humour and humanity might get you through the first round in a tight contest.
The whole purpose of the interview exercise is to test if you have the potential to stand up in court and present an argument. Your answers should have a logical structure that explains why you are right. Once you have chosen a ‘side’ don’t abandon it easily. The 5 Essex Court 2020 Pupillage Selection Report identifies structure and responding well when challenged as the key features of stronger answers to legal problems.
There is always that moment at the end where you have the opportunity to put the panel on the spot with something tricky like: how often will I be in court in my second six? Unless you really have a great question, it’s better not to ask it. If the answer is on the chambers’ website, it is definitely better not to ask it.
If you do enough interviews, you will make a mistake. You will say something stupid or trip over your words. You will come across a rude interviewer (some barristers can think rather a lot of themselves). Accept it will happen and look forward to the next one. As Joanna Hardy, and Taylor Swift, put it: ‘Shake it off.’
Adam Smith-Roberts is a barrister at Gatehouse Chambers where he specialises in property, private client and commercial work. Before becoming a barrister, Adam worked in political journalism for eight years.
So, you’ve spent hours and hours perfecting your pupillage application forms and your reward at the end of it all is a 20-minute grilling. How do you prove yourself in such a short window?
This is included in the top tips from the Secret Barrister: see bit.ly/2UcJaE1. It is just not possible to anticipate every question or every argument that may be put to you. Do whatever it takes to get in the right frame of mind. I liked to be busy in the run-up to an interview so I didn’t dwell on things. Others like to clear their diaries. Whatever works for you.
Have an answer for the classic opening questions like ‘why do you want to be a barrister?’ and ‘why are you interested in commercial law?’. If your answer to either is ‘because I like money’, think of a better one. And, as criminal barrister Joanna Hardy recommends in a thread reproduced by Legal Cheek, make sure you know where the interview is and get there early.
As Katy Thorne QC, of Doughty Street Chambers told the Guardian recently, slowing things down will give you more thinking time and make sure your answer, when it comes, will be heard and remembered. You shouldn’t be afraid of a short silence while you gather your thoughts. It happens all the time in court and it can be very impressive if you have the confidence to do it.
I didn’t take up the opportunity of mock interviews when I was applying for pupillage and I think it showed. It’s much better to make your mistakes before you get into the room (or onto the Zoom call). Mock interviews are recommended by the pupillage teams at 5 Essex Court (@Pupillages) and Henderson Chambers (@HendersonPupils) and offered by the Inns of Court.
Barristers are people too (well, some of them). They like to see a candidate with something beyond the standard excellent academic results and extra-curricular activities. Even if you don’t have something quirky on your CV, the ‘what’s your favourite biscuit?’ genre of questions provides an opportunity. While these are rarely decisive of who gets an offer, an answer that shows a bit of humour and humanity might get you through the first round in a tight contest.
The whole purpose of the interview exercise is to test if you have the potential to stand up in court and present an argument. Your answers should have a logical structure that explains why you are right. Once you have chosen a ‘side’ don’t abandon it easily. The 5 Essex Court 2020 Pupillage Selection Report identifies structure and responding well when challenged as the key features of stronger answers to legal problems.
There is always that moment at the end where you have the opportunity to put the panel on the spot with something tricky like: how often will I be in court in my second six? Unless you really have a great question, it’s better not to ask it. If the answer is on the chambers’ website, it is definitely better not to ask it.
If you do enough interviews, you will make a mistake. You will say something stupid or trip over your words. You will come across a rude interviewer (some barristers can think rather a lot of themselves). Accept it will happen and look forward to the next one. As Joanna Hardy, and Taylor Swift, put it: ‘Shake it off.’
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will
