*/
In September, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) published new guidelines designed to ensure standards for barristers working within the Coroners’ Courts. This includes a set of competences which spell out the standards expected of barristers by us and the public, and guidance and other resources to help make sure that the standards are met.
The guidelines and resources were published jointly by the BSB, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and CILEx Regulation. This means that all lawyers practising within the Coroners’ Courts are expected to adhere to the same set of professional standards.
The competences, guidelines and resources were developed with the assistance of the Chief Coroner and his office, the Deputy Chief Coroner, the Ministry of Justice, practitioners (barristers, solicitors and legal executives), coroners, bereaved people who have been involved in inquests, and organisations that provide help and support such as the Coroners’ Court Support Service (CCSS) and INQUEST.
While we are also aware of examples of good practice by barristers, we have introduced the new guidelines in response to concerns about the standards of practice among some lawyers in Coroners’ Courts. In particular, the guidelines reflect issues raised about the adversarial approach adopted by some lawyers, and public reports on the experience of bereaved families in Coroner’s Court cases. The resources, available on our website, contain videos explaining these concerns from a wide range of perspectives including from a practising barrister and from a member of a bereaved family. There are videos, too, on how the competences should be followed in practice. I strongly recommend that all barristers practising in Coroners’ Courts watch these videos and read our guidance. They are designed to be insightful and helpful for anyone practising. You can read the guidelines and watch the videos at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/coroners-court.
The competences expected from those practising in a Coroner’s Court complement the wider competences expected from all barristers in all aspects of practice as outlined in our Professional Statement for Barristers at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/training-qualification/the-professional-statement.html.
The new competences set targeted expectations for barristers working in Coroners’ Courts. They cover:
The above is a summary. Please read the full list of competences at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/coroners-court, reflect on them, and address any learning and development needs when fulfilling your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) requirements. When renewing your practising certificate next year, you will be asked if you work in this practice area. Please ensure that if you do practise in inquests and inquiries that you inform us.
Coroners will be encouraged to address practice that falls short of these competences either during the hearing itself or through raising their concerns with us as the regulator. We hope that you will find the new resources helpful.
Oliver Hanmer is the Director of Regulatory Operations at the Bar Standards Board. He has a broad remit across the Board’s activities with a particular emphasis on quality assurance and the supervision of professional standards and competence.
In September, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) published new guidelines designed to ensure standards for barristers working within the Coroners’ Courts. This includes a set of competences which spell out the standards expected of barristers by us and the public, and guidance and other resources to help make sure that the standards are met.
The guidelines and resources were published jointly by the BSB, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and CILEx Regulation. This means that all lawyers practising within the Coroners’ Courts are expected to adhere to the same set of professional standards.
The competences, guidelines and resources were developed with the assistance of the Chief Coroner and his office, the Deputy Chief Coroner, the Ministry of Justice, practitioners (barristers, solicitors and legal executives), coroners, bereaved people who have been involved in inquests, and organisations that provide help and support such as the Coroners’ Court Support Service (CCSS) and INQUEST.
While we are also aware of examples of good practice by barristers, we have introduced the new guidelines in response to concerns about the standards of practice among some lawyers in Coroners’ Courts. In particular, the guidelines reflect issues raised about the adversarial approach adopted by some lawyers, and public reports on the experience of bereaved families in Coroner’s Court cases. The resources, available on our website, contain videos explaining these concerns from a wide range of perspectives including from a practising barrister and from a member of a bereaved family. There are videos, too, on how the competences should be followed in practice. I strongly recommend that all barristers practising in Coroners’ Courts watch these videos and read our guidance. They are designed to be insightful and helpful for anyone practising. You can read the guidelines and watch the videos at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/coroners-court.
The competences expected from those practising in a Coroner’s Court complement the wider competences expected from all barristers in all aspects of practice as outlined in our Professional Statement for Barristers at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/training-qualification/the-professional-statement.html.
The new competences set targeted expectations for barristers working in Coroners’ Courts. They cover:
The above is a summary. Please read the full list of competences at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/coroners-court, reflect on them, and address any learning and development needs when fulfilling your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) requirements. When renewing your practising certificate next year, you will be asked if you work in this practice area. Please ensure that if you do practise in inquests and inquiries that you inform us.
Coroners will be encouraged to address practice that falls short of these competences either during the hearing itself or through raising their concerns with us as the regulator. We hope that you will find the new resources helpful.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Leah Arthur, a pupil, and her second seat supervisor, John Goss, share their perspectives on building a productive pupil-supervisor relationship
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
The Ministry of Justice will match-fund up to 100 criminal pupillages, with grants available to criminal chambers across England and Wales. Similar to the COIC scheme, the grants will match-fund pupillages additional to those otherwise offered without government funding
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
