*/
In September, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) published new guidelines designed to ensure standards for barristers working within the Coroners’ Courts. This includes a set of competences which spell out the standards expected of barristers by us and the public, and guidance and other resources to help make sure that the standards are met.
The guidelines and resources were published jointly by the BSB, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and CILEx Regulation. This means that all lawyers practising within the Coroners’ Courts are expected to adhere to the same set of professional standards.
The competences, guidelines and resources were developed with the assistance of the Chief Coroner and his office, the Deputy Chief Coroner, the Ministry of Justice, practitioners (barristers, solicitors and legal executives), coroners, bereaved people who have been involved in inquests, and organisations that provide help and support such as the Coroners’ Court Support Service (CCSS) and INQUEST.
While we are also aware of examples of good practice by barristers, we have introduced the new guidelines in response to concerns about the standards of practice among some lawyers in Coroners’ Courts. In particular, the guidelines reflect issues raised about the adversarial approach adopted by some lawyers, and public reports on the experience of bereaved families in Coroner’s Court cases. The resources, available on our website, contain videos explaining these concerns from a wide range of perspectives including from a practising barrister and from a member of a bereaved family. There are videos, too, on how the competences should be followed in practice. I strongly recommend that all barristers practising in Coroners’ Courts watch these videos and read our guidance. They are designed to be insightful and helpful for anyone practising. You can read the guidelines and watch the videos at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/coroners-court.
The competences expected from those practising in a Coroner’s Court complement the wider competences expected from all barristers in all aspects of practice as outlined in our Professional Statement for Barristers at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/training-qualification/the-professional-statement.html.
The new competences set targeted expectations for barristers working in Coroners’ Courts. They cover:
The above is a summary. Please read the full list of competences at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/coroners-court, reflect on them, and address any learning and development needs when fulfilling your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) requirements. When renewing your practising certificate next year, you will be asked if you work in this practice area. Please ensure that if you do practise in inquests and inquiries that you inform us.
Coroners will be encouraged to address practice that falls short of these competences either during the hearing itself or through raising their concerns with us as the regulator. We hope that you will find the new resources helpful.
Oliver Hanmer is the Director of Regulatory Operations at the Bar Standards Board. He has a broad remit across the Board’s activities with a particular emphasis on quality assurance and the supervision of professional standards and competence.
In September, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) published new guidelines designed to ensure standards for barristers working within the Coroners’ Courts. This includes a set of competences which spell out the standards expected of barristers by us and the public, and guidance and other resources to help make sure that the standards are met.
The guidelines and resources were published jointly by the BSB, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and CILEx Regulation. This means that all lawyers practising within the Coroners’ Courts are expected to adhere to the same set of professional standards.
The competences, guidelines and resources were developed with the assistance of the Chief Coroner and his office, the Deputy Chief Coroner, the Ministry of Justice, practitioners (barristers, solicitors and legal executives), coroners, bereaved people who have been involved in inquests, and organisations that provide help and support such as the Coroners’ Court Support Service (CCSS) and INQUEST.
While we are also aware of examples of good practice by barristers, we have introduced the new guidelines in response to concerns about the standards of practice among some lawyers in Coroners’ Courts. In particular, the guidelines reflect issues raised about the adversarial approach adopted by some lawyers, and public reports on the experience of bereaved families in Coroner’s Court cases. The resources, available on our website, contain videos explaining these concerns from a wide range of perspectives including from a practising barrister and from a member of a bereaved family. There are videos, too, on how the competences should be followed in practice. I strongly recommend that all barristers practising in Coroners’ Courts watch these videos and read our guidance. They are designed to be insightful and helpful for anyone practising. You can read the guidelines and watch the videos at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/coroners-court.
The competences expected from those practising in a Coroner’s Court complement the wider competences expected from all barristers in all aspects of practice as outlined in our Professional Statement for Barristers at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/training-qualification/the-professional-statement.html.
The new competences set targeted expectations for barristers working in Coroners’ Courts. They cover:
The above is a summary. Please read the full list of competences at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/coroners-court, reflect on them, and address any learning and development needs when fulfilling your Continuing Professional Development (CPD) requirements. When renewing your practising certificate next year, you will be asked if you work in this practice area. Please ensure that if you do practise in inquests and inquiries that you inform us.
Coroners will be encouraged to address practice that falls short of these competences either during the hearing itself or through raising their concerns with us as the regulator. We hope that you will find the new resources helpful.
Chair of the Bar sets out a busy calendar for the rest of the year
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Examined by Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Time is precious for barristers. Every moment spent chasing paperwork, organising diaries, or managing admin is time taken away from what matters most: preparation, advocacy and your clients. That’s where Eden Assistants step in
AlphaBiolabs has announced its latest Giving Back donation to RAY Ceredigion, a grassroots West Wales charity that provides play, learning and community opportunities for families across Ceredigion County
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
Come in with your eyes open, but don’t let fear cloud the prospect. A view from practice by John Dove
Anon Academic explains why he’s leaving the world of English literature for the Bar – after all, the two are not as far apart as they may first seem...
Review by Stephen Cragg KC
