*/
Chancery Bar Association, COMBAR and TECBAR
The Business and Property Court was launched in July to provide not only a new name for England and Wales’ international dispute resolution jurisdictions, but to act as a single umbrella for business specialist courts across England and Wales. From the Chancellor, Sir Geoffrey Vos’s resolutely upbeat opening, which was full enough for each of the subsequent speakers to start by thanking him for having already said much of what they had intended to say, it was evident ‘Brave New World’ of the session’s title was to be taken at face value and not as a sly reference to Huxley’s dystopian novel.
He started by outlining challenges the new court would have to meet: the need to be ‘at the top of its game’ in the context of Brexit and competition from English language courts in France, Germany, the Netherlands and, soon, Belgium and the need to adapt to meet the needs of businesses driven by technological changes, where the use of AI and digitally created smart contracts was becoming commonplace. To reinforce the point, the Chancellor said that ‘3 trillion’ smart contracts will have been entered into, I think, across the globe by the end of this year (simply trying to process the ‘3 trillion’ figure briefly interrupted my note-taking).
Nonetheless, the Chancellor believed the common law had the necessary flexibility to meet the huge challenges these new technologies posed. Big figures were not confined to the Chancellor’s introduction. Rosemary Martin, who stood out among a crop of high quality speakers, had responsibility at Vodafone for a legal budget of £150m per annum, while collectively the annual legal budgets of the FTSE 100 companies, whose general counsel the GC100 represents, was £45bn. She praised the quality of the judgments of the English commercial courts, the certainty around the process and the integrity of the system but warned that ‘less wonderful’ were speed, efficiency and cost. The GC100 had been impressed by Lord Dyson’s response to its expressed concerns, the early fruits of which were the Etherton working party and the forthcoming changes to the disclosure rules. These were then outlined by Andrew Spink QC, who may have regarded himself as having drawn the short straw in having to deal with such a ‘nuts and bolts’ topic but made an extremely engaging job of it.
Alexander Nissen QC welcomed the structure of the Business and Property Court, which enabled the continuation of individual specialist approaches within the structure of the single court. He spoke about the Shorter and Flexible Trial Schemes, judge-led ADR and the growth of early neutral evaluation. I wish space allowed me to do justice to his contribution and to that of Mark Cawson QC who gave the Circuits’ perspective on the new Business and Property Court.
Rawdon Crozier is a barrister at KBG Chambers, Plymouth, specialising in property law. He is a member of the Counsel editorial board, writes for several legal journals and also writes poetry. In 2015 he went straight from Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 in the Supreme Court to starting chemotherapy and ‘got the right result in the latter’.
The Business and Property Court was launched in July to provide not only a new name for England and Wales’ international dispute resolution jurisdictions, but to act as a single umbrella for business specialist courts across England and Wales. From the Chancellor, Sir Geoffrey Vos’s resolutely upbeat opening, which was full enough for each of the subsequent speakers to start by thanking him for having already said much of what they had intended to say, it was evident ‘Brave New World’ of the session’s title was to be taken at face value and not as a sly reference to Huxley’s dystopian novel.
He started by outlining challenges the new court would have to meet: the need to be ‘at the top of its game’ in the context of Brexit and competition from English language courts in France, Germany, the Netherlands and, soon, Belgium and the need to adapt to meet the needs of businesses driven by technological changes, where the use of AI and digitally created smart contracts was becoming commonplace. To reinforce the point, the Chancellor said that ‘3 trillion’ smart contracts will have been entered into, I think, across the globe by the end of this year (simply trying to process the ‘3 trillion’ figure briefly interrupted my note-taking).
Nonetheless, the Chancellor believed the common law had the necessary flexibility to meet the huge challenges these new technologies posed. Big figures were not confined to the Chancellor’s introduction. Rosemary Martin, who stood out among a crop of high quality speakers, had responsibility at Vodafone for a legal budget of £150m per annum, while collectively the annual legal budgets of the FTSE 100 companies, whose general counsel the GC100 represents, was £45bn. She praised the quality of the judgments of the English commercial courts, the certainty around the process and the integrity of the system but warned that ‘less wonderful’ were speed, efficiency and cost. The GC100 had been impressed by Lord Dyson’s response to its expressed concerns, the early fruits of which were the Etherton working party and the forthcoming changes to the disclosure rules. These were then outlined by Andrew Spink QC, who may have regarded himself as having drawn the short straw in having to deal with such a ‘nuts and bolts’ topic but made an extremely engaging job of it.
Alexander Nissen QC welcomed the structure of the Business and Property Court, which enabled the continuation of individual specialist approaches within the structure of the single court. He spoke about the Shorter and Flexible Trial Schemes, judge-led ADR and the growth of early neutral evaluation. I wish space allowed me to do justice to his contribution and to that of Mark Cawson QC who gave the Circuits’ perspective on the new Business and Property Court.
Chancery Bar Association, COMBAR and TECBAR
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Leah Arthur, a pupil, and her second seat supervisor, John Goss, share their perspectives on building a productive pupil-supervisor relationship
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
The Ministry of Justice will match-fund up to 100 criminal pupillages, with grants available to criminal chambers across England and Wales. Similar to the COIC scheme, the grants will match-fund pupillages additional to those otherwise offered without government funding
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
