*/
In an era where the surge of artificial intelligence (AI) captures global attention, an equally important but less discussed advancement is making waves – the intersection of neurotechnology and law. This pivotal juncture in human innovation has prompted the establishment of the Institute of Neurotechnology & Law, spearheaded by Harry Lambert, a barrister with a unique blend of expertise in product liability, privacy, and medical law.
In recent years neurotechnology has made great strides, and we now live in a world where brain to brain communication, memory scanning and transcription of thoughts to text (to name but a few) are all possible. As neurotechnology swiftly evolves, its integration into everyday life will have profound implications on privacy, ethics and personal autonomy. Suddenly we need to protect a whole new raft of rights that we never imagined needed protection; what the ethicist Rafael Yuste has called ‘neurorights’.
The foundation of the Institute comes at a critical time. It is no exaggeration to say that recent advances in neurotechnology mark a crucial moment; it is imperative that we engage in balanced and informed debates about neurorights.
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law aims to ensure that as these technologies develop, they do so in a manner that aligns with the best interests of humanity. The core mission is to foster discussions that will guide the responsible development of neurotechnological innovations. By bringing together legal experts, technologists, bioethicists and policymakers, the Institute seeks to build a robust framework for ethical governance and legislation in this dynamic arena.
It’s common to hear debates surrounding AI, but the fascinating topic of neurotechnology and its legal implications remains largely in the shadows. The Institute of Neurotechnology and Law is set to change that, ensuring that this area receives the attention and scrutiny it deserves. Find out more at www.neurotechlaw.com
In an era where the surge of artificial intelligence (AI) captures global attention, an equally important but less discussed advancement is making waves – the intersection of neurotechnology and law. This pivotal juncture in human innovation has prompted the establishment of the Institute of Neurotechnology & Law, spearheaded by Harry Lambert, a barrister with a unique blend of expertise in product liability, privacy, and medical law.
In recent years neurotechnology has made great strides, and we now live in a world where brain to brain communication, memory scanning and transcription of thoughts to text (to name but a few) are all possible. As neurotechnology swiftly evolves, its integration into everyday life will have profound implications on privacy, ethics and personal autonomy. Suddenly we need to protect a whole new raft of rights that we never imagined needed protection; what the ethicist Rafael Yuste has called ‘neurorights’.
The foundation of the Institute comes at a critical time. It is no exaggeration to say that recent advances in neurotechnology mark a crucial moment; it is imperative that we engage in balanced and informed debates about neurorights.
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law aims to ensure that as these technologies develop, they do so in a manner that aligns with the best interests of humanity. The core mission is to foster discussions that will guide the responsible development of neurotechnological innovations. By bringing together legal experts, technologists, bioethicists and policymakers, the Institute seeks to build a robust framework for ethical governance and legislation in this dynamic arena.
It’s common to hear debates surrounding AI, but the fascinating topic of neurotechnology and its legal implications remains largely in the shadows. The Institute of Neurotechnology and Law is set to change that, ensuring that this area receives the attention and scrutiny it deserves. Find out more at www.neurotechlaw.com
Justice system requires urgent attention and next steps on the Harman Review
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
Many disabled barristers face entrenched obstacles to KC appointment – both procedural and systemic, writes Diego F Soto-Miranda
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial Competition has boosted the skills, knowledge and confidence of tens of thousands of state school students – as sixth-form teacher Conor Duffy and Young Citizens’ Akasa Pradhan report
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal system centre stage once more. Will it galvanise change? asks Rehna Azim
