*/
Lord Justice Jackson has called for fixed legal costs to apply in all civil claims valued up to £250,000.
Currently, fixed recoverable costs only apply to personal injury claims valued up to £25,000. But the architect of the costs regime introduced by the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, has suggested there should be a fixed cost ‘grid’ for all multi-track cases worth up to £250,000, irrespective of their complexity.
Jackson urged the government to implement the change as a priority and said it could be introduced by the end of the year.
He told the Insolvency Practitioners Association that ‘high litigation costs inhibit access to justice’ and ‘if costs prevent access to justice, this undermines the rule of law’.
But Chairman of the Bar, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, warned that using the value of a case to determine costs could curtail access to justice, by making it economically unviable to take on complex cases.
‘A low value but legally complex case may demand a great deal more work than the allocated cost band will allow. This means lawyers may not take on complicated, low value cases, thus preventing legitimate claims from being pursued,’ she said.
She warned that the proposal could tilt the litigation playing field further in favour of big business and the state, which may well be willing to spend large sums of money – beyond what is recoverable.
In a separate speech to the Solicitors’ Costs conference, Jackson proposed that the legal profession revisit the idea of setting up a contingent legal aid fund (CLAF) that would operate as a not-for-profit third-party litigation funder to finance ‘ordinary’ litigation as well as ‘deserving’ cases.
The Bar Council backed the suggestion and said it had already opened discussions with CILEx and the Law Society to set up a working group, but said its viability and scope would need to be considered carefully.
Lord Justice Jackson has called for fixed legal costs to apply in all civil claims valued up to £250,000.
Currently, fixed recoverable costs only apply to personal injury claims valued up to £25,000. But the architect of the costs regime introduced by the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, has suggested there should be a fixed cost ‘grid’ for all multi-track cases worth up to £250,000, irrespective of their complexity.
Jackson urged the government to implement the change as a priority and said it could be introduced by the end of the year.
He told the Insolvency Practitioners Association that ‘high litigation costs inhibit access to justice’ and ‘if costs prevent access to justice, this undermines the rule of law’.
But Chairman of the Bar, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, warned that using the value of a case to determine costs could curtail access to justice, by making it economically unviable to take on complex cases.
‘A low value but legally complex case may demand a great deal more work than the allocated cost band will allow. This means lawyers may not take on complicated, low value cases, thus preventing legitimate claims from being pursued,’ she said.
She warned that the proposal could tilt the litigation playing field further in favour of big business and the state, which may well be willing to spend large sums of money – beyond what is recoverable.
In a separate speech to the Solicitors’ Costs conference, Jackson proposed that the legal profession revisit the idea of setting up a contingent legal aid fund (CLAF) that would operate as a not-for-profit third-party litigation funder to finance ‘ordinary’ litigation as well as ‘deserving’ cases.
The Bar Council backed the suggestion and said it had already opened discussions with CILEx and the Law Society to set up a working group, but said its viability and scope would need to be considered carefully.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
By Kem Kemal, CEO, Henry Dannell
By BSK Financial Planning
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Kick off your career at the Bar Council’s Pupillage Fair this October – it’s one of the most valuable opportunities for aspiring barristers, says Amelia Clegg
Join us on Saturday 21 November 2026 at Leeds Beckett University and see for yourself why the North continues to be an exceptional place to build a career at the Bar
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
