*/
Television cameras are to be allowed into crown courts for the first time, the justice minister has announced.
Shailesh Vara said that judges’ sentencing remarks in eight courts in England and Wales will be filmed in a three-month pilot scheme.
The courts taking part are the Old Bailey and courts at Southwark in south London, Manchester (Crown Square), Birmingham, Bristol, Liverpool, Leeds and Cardiff.
Filming and recording in courts is banned under s 41 of the Criminal Justice Act 1925 and the Contempt of Court Act 1981. But it has been permitted in the Supreme Court since 2009 and in the Court of Appeal since 2013.
Vara said: ‘My hope is that this will lead to more openness and transparency as to what happens in our courts. Broadcasting sentencing remarks would allow the public to see and hear the judge’s decision in their own words.’
The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, said he was ‘interested’ to see how this pilot progresses and that he will work with the Ministry of Justice to assess the impact of cameras in court.
The cameras will film only the judges passing sentence. There will be no footage of other parts of a case or any other court users, including staff, victims, witnesses, defendants, barristers and solicitors.
Television cameras are to be allowed into crown courts for the first time, the justice minister has announced.
Shailesh Vara said that judges’ sentencing remarks in eight courts in England and Wales will be filmed in a three-month pilot scheme.
The courts taking part are the Old Bailey and courts at Southwark in south London, Manchester (Crown Square), Birmingham, Bristol, Liverpool, Leeds and Cardiff.
Filming and recording in courts is banned under s 41 of the Criminal Justice Act 1925 and the Contempt of Court Act 1981. But it has been permitted in the Supreme Court since 2009 and in the Court of Appeal since 2013.
Vara said: ‘My hope is that this will lead to more openness and transparency as to what happens in our courts. Broadcasting sentencing remarks would allow the public to see and hear the judge’s decision in their own words.’
The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, said he was ‘interested’ to see how this pilot progresses and that he will work with the Ministry of Justice to assess the impact of cameras in court.
The cameras will film only the judges passing sentence. There will be no footage of other parts of a case or any other court users, including staff, victims, witnesses, defendants, barristers and solicitors.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Leah Arthur, a pupil, and her second seat supervisor, John Goss, share their perspectives on building a productive pupil-supervisor relationship
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
The Ministry of Justice will match-fund up to 100 criminal pupillages, with grants available to criminal chambers across England and Wales. Similar to the COIC scheme, the grants will match-fund pupillages additional to those otherwise offered without government funding
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
