*/
Shadow Attorney General Dominic Grieve lambasted the waste of money on an “entirely unnecessary” Supreme Court, when he delivered the recent Boydell lecture.
The government was “wasting” more than £130 million on an “entirely unnecessary set of new premises for the equally unnecessary Supreme Court, with a quadrupling of subsequent running costs”, he said, while the impact of legal aid reforms has left law firms “struggling”.Mr Grieve went on to lament the “slow death of ministerial responsibility”. “Over the last few years there has been a drive to actually achieve the separation of powers so beloved of Montesquieu. In furtherance of this, we are going to have our Supreme Court, have created a Judicial Appointments Commission and removed the judicial role of the Lord Chancellor. The Government is now discussing the propriety of the Attorney General taking any prosecutorial decisions, and it has even been suggested that the Attorney’s role as legal adviser to government should be given to a non-political lawyer. “Although no final decision has been taken on the future role of the Attorney, it is the case that the present Attorney is already operating under a self-denying ordinance in respect of keeping her distance from any sensitive investigations in which her involvement is not required by statute.”
In a wide-ranging speech, Grieve vowed not to interfere with the jury system or rules of evidence. A “major priority” for a Conservative administration would be providing extra prison capacity of 5,000 places above the government’s figure including after care to improve rehabilitation, he said.
Mr Grieve also expressed delight that the Bar Council had revisted the possibility of a Contingency Legal Aid Fund (“CLAF”). “It’s a proposal in which I took an interest in the mid 1990s before I was elected to Parliament.” However he stressed that the “key to resuscitating justice lay not just in policy but in the attitude of politicians and particularly the Executive.”
The government was “wasting” more than £130 million on an “entirely unnecessary set of new premises for the equally unnecessary Supreme Court, with a quadrupling of subsequent running costs”, he said, while the impact of legal aid reforms has left law firms “struggling”.Mr Grieve went on to lament the “slow death of ministerial responsibility”. “Over the last few years there has been a drive to actually achieve the separation of powers so beloved of Montesquieu. In furtherance of this, we are going to have our Supreme Court, have created a Judicial Appointments Commission and removed the judicial role of the Lord Chancellor. The Government is now discussing the propriety of the Attorney General taking any prosecutorial decisions, and it has even been suggested that the Attorney’s role as legal adviser to government should be given to a non-political lawyer. “Although no final decision has been taken on the future role of the Attorney, it is the case that the present Attorney is already operating under a self-denying ordinance in respect of keeping her distance from any sensitive investigations in which her involvement is not required by statute.”
In a wide-ranging speech, Grieve vowed not to interfere with the jury system or rules of evidence. A “major priority” for a Conservative administration would be providing extra prison capacity of 5,000 places above the government’s figure including after care to improve rehabilitation, he said.
Mr Grieve also expressed delight that the Bar Council had revisted the possibility of a Contingency Legal Aid Fund (“CLAF”). “It’s a proposal in which I took an interest in the mid 1990s before I was elected to Parliament.” However he stressed that the “key to resuscitating justice lay not just in policy but in the attitude of politicians and particularly the Executive.”
Shadow Attorney General Dominic Grieve lambasted the waste of money on an “entirely unnecessary” Supreme Court, when he delivered the recent Boydell lecture.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
