*/
Shadow Attorney General Dominic Grieve lambasted the waste of money on an “entirely unnecessary” Supreme Court, when he delivered the recent Boydell lecture.
The government was “wasting” more than £130 million on an “entirely unnecessary set of new premises for the equally unnecessary Supreme Court, with a quadrupling of subsequent running costs”, he said, while the impact of legal aid reforms has left law firms “struggling”.Mr Grieve went on to lament the “slow death of ministerial responsibility”. “Over the last few years there has been a drive to actually achieve the separation of powers so beloved of Montesquieu. In furtherance of this, we are going to have our Supreme Court, have created a Judicial Appointments Commission and removed the judicial role of the Lord Chancellor. The Government is now discussing the propriety of the Attorney General taking any prosecutorial decisions, and it has even been suggested that the Attorney’s role as legal adviser to government should be given to a non-political lawyer. “Although no final decision has been taken on the future role of the Attorney, it is the case that the present Attorney is already operating under a self-denying ordinance in respect of keeping her distance from any sensitive investigations in which her involvement is not required by statute.”
In a wide-ranging speech, Grieve vowed not to interfere with the jury system or rules of evidence. A “major priority” for a Conservative administration would be providing extra prison capacity of 5,000 places above the government’s figure including after care to improve rehabilitation, he said.
Mr Grieve also expressed delight that the Bar Council had revisted the possibility of a Contingency Legal Aid Fund (“CLAF”). “It’s a proposal in which I took an interest in the mid 1990s before I was elected to Parliament.” However he stressed that the “key to resuscitating justice lay not just in policy but in the attitude of politicians and particularly the Executive.”
The government was “wasting” more than £130 million on an “entirely unnecessary set of new premises for the equally unnecessary Supreme Court, with a quadrupling of subsequent running costs”, he said, while the impact of legal aid reforms has left law firms “struggling”.Mr Grieve went on to lament the “slow death of ministerial responsibility”. “Over the last few years there has been a drive to actually achieve the separation of powers so beloved of Montesquieu. In furtherance of this, we are going to have our Supreme Court, have created a Judicial Appointments Commission and removed the judicial role of the Lord Chancellor. The Government is now discussing the propriety of the Attorney General taking any prosecutorial decisions, and it has even been suggested that the Attorney’s role as legal adviser to government should be given to a non-political lawyer. “Although no final decision has been taken on the future role of the Attorney, it is the case that the present Attorney is already operating under a self-denying ordinance in respect of keeping her distance from any sensitive investigations in which her involvement is not required by statute.”
In a wide-ranging speech, Grieve vowed not to interfere with the jury system or rules of evidence. A “major priority” for a Conservative administration would be providing extra prison capacity of 5,000 places above the government’s figure including after care to improve rehabilitation, he said.
Mr Grieve also expressed delight that the Bar Council had revisted the possibility of a Contingency Legal Aid Fund (“CLAF”). “It’s a proposal in which I took an interest in the mid 1990s before I was elected to Parliament.” However he stressed that the “key to resuscitating justice lay not just in policy but in the attitude of politicians and particularly the Executive.”
Shadow Attorney General Dominic Grieve lambasted the waste of money on an “entirely unnecessary” Supreme Court, when he delivered the recent Boydell lecture.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base