*/
Shadow Attorney General Dominic Grieve lambasted the waste of money on an “entirely unnecessary” Supreme Court, when he delivered the recent Boydell lecture.
The government was “wasting” more than £130 million on an “entirely unnecessary set of new premises for the equally unnecessary Supreme Court, with a quadrupling of subsequent running costs”, he said, while the impact of legal aid reforms has left law firms “struggling”.Mr Grieve went on to lament the “slow death of ministerial responsibility”. “Over the last few years there has been a drive to actually achieve the separation of powers so beloved of Montesquieu. In furtherance of this, we are going to have our Supreme Court, have created a Judicial Appointments Commission and removed the judicial role of the Lord Chancellor. The Government is now discussing the propriety of the Attorney General taking any prosecutorial decisions, and it has even been suggested that the Attorney’s role as legal adviser to government should be given to a non-political lawyer. “Although no final decision has been taken on the future role of the Attorney, it is the case that the present Attorney is already operating under a self-denying ordinance in respect of keeping her distance from any sensitive investigations in which her involvement is not required by statute.”
In a wide-ranging speech, Grieve vowed not to interfere with the jury system or rules of evidence. A “major priority” for a Conservative administration would be providing extra prison capacity of 5,000 places above the government’s figure including after care to improve rehabilitation, he said.
Mr Grieve also expressed delight that the Bar Council had revisted the possibility of a Contingency Legal Aid Fund (“CLAF”). “It’s a proposal in which I took an interest in the mid 1990s before I was elected to Parliament.” However he stressed that the “key to resuscitating justice lay not just in policy but in the attitude of politicians and particularly the Executive.”
The government was “wasting” more than £130 million on an “entirely unnecessary set of new premises for the equally unnecessary Supreme Court, with a quadrupling of subsequent running costs”, he said, while the impact of legal aid reforms has left law firms “struggling”.Mr Grieve went on to lament the “slow death of ministerial responsibility”. “Over the last few years there has been a drive to actually achieve the separation of powers so beloved of Montesquieu. In furtherance of this, we are going to have our Supreme Court, have created a Judicial Appointments Commission and removed the judicial role of the Lord Chancellor. The Government is now discussing the propriety of the Attorney General taking any prosecutorial decisions, and it has even been suggested that the Attorney’s role as legal adviser to government should be given to a non-political lawyer. “Although no final decision has been taken on the future role of the Attorney, it is the case that the present Attorney is already operating under a self-denying ordinance in respect of keeping her distance from any sensitive investigations in which her involvement is not required by statute.”
In a wide-ranging speech, Grieve vowed not to interfere with the jury system or rules of evidence. A “major priority” for a Conservative administration would be providing extra prison capacity of 5,000 places above the government’s figure including after care to improve rehabilitation, he said.
Mr Grieve also expressed delight that the Bar Council had revisted the possibility of a Contingency Legal Aid Fund (“CLAF”). “It’s a proposal in which I took an interest in the mid 1990s before I was elected to Parliament.” However he stressed that the “key to resuscitating justice lay not just in policy but in the attitude of politicians and particularly the Executive.”
Shadow Attorney General Dominic Grieve lambasted the waste of money on an “entirely unnecessary” Supreme Court, when he delivered the recent Boydell lecture.
The age of criminal responsibility, extreme weather and conflict resolution – plus, new protocol for reporting bullying at the Bar
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, discusses the upcoming changes to pensions and Inheritance Tax and the potential impact on your financial future
Save the Children UK is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Can reflective practice – a staple in other professions – meaningfully support the Bar? Emma Cross reports back from last year’s pilot
Solicitor General Ellie Reeves KC MP discusses her decade as a trade union and employment law barrister, the demands of life as a Law Officer and the number one priority shaping her work. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
Why every major sporting event needs an anti-corruption policy. By Louis Weston
At least not that way, says Richard Paige