*/
The deputy president of the Supreme Court and the only woman among its 12 justices has spoken out against the ‘homogenous’ male, predominantly public school and Oxbridge make-up of the top judges.
Due to retirements, six posts at the UK’s top court will become available between September 2016 and December 2018.
‘If we do not manage to achieve a much more diverse court in the process of filling them, we ought to be ashamed of ourselves,’ Lady Hale told an audience at Birmingham University.
Hale suggested that a search committee could be created to help identify and encourage potential candidates.
Noting its all white and British make-up, she also suggested that the Judicial Appointments Commission should make greater use of the ‘tipping point’ or equal merit provision when appointing senior judges.
Under the Equality Act 2010, where two candidates are of equal merit, selection panels can choose the one from the less represented background in order to increase diversity.
Hale said that ‘diversity of background and experience’ as well as ‘excellence’ is important in appointments.
‘It really bothers me that there are women who know or ought to know that they are as good as the men around them, but who won’t apply for fear of being thought to be appointed just because they are a woman,’ she said.
Hale added that she would be ‘completely unembarrassed’ if she had been appointed because the ‘powers that be realised the need for a woman’, because, she said ‘they were right’.
‘We owe it to our sex, but also to the future of the law and the legal system, to step up to the plate,’ she said.
Her remarks may be seen as a rebuttal of her fellow justice Lord Sumption’s comments that it could take 50 years to achieve gender equality among the senior judiciary. He suggested that any move to hasten that could have ‘appalling consequences’ for the justice system.
Meanwhile, speaking at a conference on Women in Law, Hodge Jones & Allen partner, Sasha Barton, claimed that male barristers make ‘sexual jokes’ in court in order to ingratiate themselves with the predominantly male judges.
Barton said that women lawyers feel pressure to treat sexist comments as harmless banter for fear of being made to feel ‘prudish and humourless’.
The deputy president of the Supreme Court and the only woman among its 12 justices has spoken out against the ‘homogenous’ male, predominantly public school and Oxbridge make-up of the top judges.
Due to retirements, six posts at the UK’s top court will become available between September 2016 and December 2018.
‘If we do not manage to achieve a much more diverse court in the process of filling them, we ought to be ashamed of ourselves,’ Lady Hale told an audience at Birmingham University.
Hale suggested that a search committee could be created to help identify and encourage potential candidates.
Noting its all white and British make-up, she also suggested that the Judicial Appointments Commission should make greater use of the ‘tipping point’ or equal merit provision when appointing senior judges.
Under the Equality Act 2010, where two candidates are of equal merit, selection panels can choose the one from the less represented background in order to increase diversity.
Hale said that ‘diversity of background and experience’ as well as ‘excellence’ is important in appointments.
‘It really bothers me that there are women who know or ought to know that they are as good as the men around them, but who won’t apply for fear of being thought to be appointed just because they are a woman,’ she said.
Hale added that she would be ‘completely unembarrassed’ if she had been appointed because the ‘powers that be realised the need for a woman’, because, she said ‘they were right’.
‘We owe it to our sex, but also to the future of the law and the legal system, to step up to the plate,’ she said.
Her remarks may be seen as a rebuttal of her fellow justice Lord Sumption’s comments that it could take 50 years to achieve gender equality among the senior judiciary. He suggested that any move to hasten that could have ‘appalling consequences’ for the justice system.
Meanwhile, speaking at a conference on Women in Law, Hodge Jones & Allen partner, Sasha Barton, claimed that male barristers make ‘sexual jokes’ in court in order to ingratiate themselves with the predominantly male judges.
Barton said that women lawyers feel pressure to treat sexist comments as harmless banter for fear of being made to feel ‘prudish and humourless’.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
By Kem Kemal, CEO, Henry Dannell
By BSK Financial Planning
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Kick off your career at the Bar Council’s Pupillage Fair this October – it’s one of the most valuable opportunities for aspiring barristers, says Amelia Clegg
Join us on Saturday 21 November 2026 at Leeds Beckett University and see for yourself why the North continues to be an exceptional place to build a career at the Bar
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
