*/
Some solicitors are overcharging clients for the work done by barristers, the Bar Council has claimed.
In a practice note, Retainers, Fee Arrangements and Non-Standard Work Arrangements, revised in February, the Bar Council said it is aware that in some situations, solicitors are charging clients more for the services provided by barristers than the barristers themselves are charging.
The Bar Council’s Ethics and Remuneration Committee explained that the practice may be permissible in some situations, for instance where the arrangement is one in which the barristers’ fees are genuinely a cost to the solicitors themselves, or where it is done with the informed agreement of a ‘sophisticated commercial client’.
But it warned that it is ‘quite wrong’ where the barristers’ fees ought to be charged as a disbursement, and said it could raise serious questions about the solicitors’ professional conduct.
The committee said: ‘In most circumstances, this will not be an issue for you. You will not usually be aware of communications between your solicitors and their client about fees.’
It added: ‘Your solicitors’ charges to their client are also primarily a matter between your solicitors and that client, and whether your solicitors’ actions are permissible is a matter of law and conduct for your solicitors as independent professionals.’
However, the note told barristers to ensure that they are not ‘actively and knowingly’ involved in any arrangement where the client is charged more for their services than they are charging in circumstances in which it is unlawful or in breach of the solicitor’s duties to the client.
Some solicitors are overcharging clients for the work done by barristers, the Bar Council has claimed.
In a practice note, Retainers, Fee Arrangements and Non-Standard Work Arrangements, revised in February, the Bar Council said it is aware that in some situations, solicitors are charging clients more for the services provided by barristers than the barristers themselves are charging.
The Bar Council’s Ethics and Remuneration Committee explained that the practice may be permissible in some situations, for instance where the arrangement is one in which the barristers’ fees are genuinely a cost to the solicitors themselves, or where it is done with the informed agreement of a ‘sophisticated commercial client’.
But it warned that it is ‘quite wrong’ where the barristers’ fees ought to be charged as a disbursement, and said it could raise serious questions about the solicitors’ professional conduct.
The committee said: ‘In most circumstances, this will not be an issue for you. You will not usually be aware of communications between your solicitors and their client about fees.’
It added: ‘Your solicitors’ charges to their client are also primarily a matter between your solicitors and that client, and whether your solicitors’ actions are permissible is a matter of law and conduct for your solicitors as independent professionals.’
However, the note told barristers to ensure that they are not ‘actively and knowingly’ involved in any arrangement where the client is charged more for their services than they are charging in circumstances in which it is unlawful or in breach of the solicitor’s duties to the client.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC present their best buys for this holiday season
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
