*/
SIR Duncan Nichol CBE’s review of the Queen’s Counsel Appointment System was jointly commissioned by the Bar Council and the Law Society in September 2008. The terms of reference of the review included considering whether it would be appropriate to red-affirm the purpose of the award; the forms of excellence that it is intended to recognise; and the range of criteria against which applicants for the award are assessed.
Following the move away from the previously used “soundings” process three years ago, Sir Duncan considered the operation of the new selection process; the business model supporting the selection process and the personnel who will comprise the selection panel in the future. The new process – which is an open and independent competition, undertaken by a selection panel – is sponsored by the Law Society and the Bar Council with the approval of the Lord Chancellor. On 18 December 2008 the Law Society and the Bar Council
received Sir Duncan’s review. The review will now be considered in detail by the General Management Committee of the Bar Council and the [Legal Affairs and Policy Board] of the Law Society.
Commenting on the review Des Hudson, the Chief Executive of the Law Society, said today:
"The Society would like to thank Sir Duncan Nichol for his thorough review of the Queen's Counsel appointments system. The Society will be giving consideration to his report and recommendations. Any system could benefit from improvements to its operation and considering the potential for improvements was a key factor in Sir Duncan's terms of reference. The essential point remains that the current system is infinitely preferable to the former "soundings" behind the scenes which caused concerns over the fairness of the award of Silk in the past. Once we have considered the report we will be discussing it with the Bar and our members before confirming our decisions."
Commenting on the review, the Chief Executive of the Bar Council, David Hobart, said today:
“The review of the Queen’s Counsel appointment system is of great interest to both branches of the legal profession, its clients and the judiciary. The current system enjoys the confidence of a wide range of interested parties and ensures that ‘QC’ remains a symbol of excellence recognised the world over. The Bar Council is keen to ensure that the QC marque is not diluted, and has made suggestions to this effect to Sir Duncan in the preparation of his report. Once the Bar Council and the Law Society have had the chance to consider the report, we expect to comment further.”
Commenting on the review Des Hudson, the Chief Executive of the Law Society, said today:
"The Society would like to thank Sir Duncan Nichol for his thorough review of the Queen's Counsel appointments system. The Society will be giving consideration to his report and recommendations. Any system could benefit from improvements to its operation and considering the potential for improvements was a key factor in Sir Duncan's terms of reference. The essential point remains that the current system is infinitely preferable to the former "soundings" behind the scenes which caused concerns over the fairness of the award of Silk in the past. Once we have considered the report we will be discussing it with the Bar and our members before confirming our decisions."
Commenting on the review, the Chief Executive of the Bar Council, David Hobart, said today:
“The review of the Queen’s Counsel appointment system is of great interest to both branches of the legal profession, its clients and the judiciary. The current system enjoys the confidence of a wide range of interested parties and ensures that ‘QC’ remains a symbol of excellence recognised the world over. The Bar Council is keen to ensure that the QC marque is not diluted, and has made suggestions to this effect to Sir Duncan in the preparation of his report. Once the Bar Council and the Law Society have had the chance to consider the report, we expect to comment further.”
SIR Duncan Nichol CBE’s review of the Queen’s Counsel Appointment System was jointly commissioned by the Bar Council and the Law Society in September 2008. The terms of reference of the review included considering whether it would be appropriate to red-affirm the purpose of the award; the forms of excellence that it is intended to recognise; and the range of criteria against which applicants for the award are assessed.
Following the move away from the previously used “soundings” process three years ago, Sir Duncan considered the operation of the new selection process; the business model supporting the selection process and the personnel who will comprise the selection panel in the future. The new process – which is an open and independent competition, undertaken by a selection panel – is sponsored by the Law Society and the Bar Council with the approval of the Lord Chancellor. On 18 December 2008 the Law Society and the Bar Council
received Sir Duncan’s review. The review will now be considered in detail by the General Management Committee of the Bar Council and the [Legal Affairs and Policy Board] of the Law Society.
In the battle of ideas and values which the maintenance of the rule of law involves, lawyers remain in the frontline
An update by Rachel Cooper of Coram Chambers
There is still time to submit your entries for the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2022, with entries closing on Friday 26 November!
Leading alcohol testing provider AlphaBiolabs is now offering SmartMobile™, a new and highly innovative portable breath alcohol testing device with a built-in camera for personal identification, as well as optional GPS tracking capabilities.
Like it or loathe it, admin is a part of work and life but it can start to dominate and feel a burden. Here is a checklist of tips to help you feel calm about your inbox, from the virtual assistants who keep barristers organised
AlphaBiolabs enhances its SCRAM CAM® continuous alcohol monitoring service
Upskilling courts with a more forensic approach to domestic abuse, Professor Monckton-Smith talks to Laurence Cooper about her groundbreaking research, identifying patterns of coercive control and use of the homicide timeline
Dropping hearings into Zoom is not the end game, writes Professor Richard Susskind OBE
Racial disparity and racism can impact experiences in the courtroom; Abimbola Johnson has some constructive solutions on how we can effectively challenge it
Zira Hussain shares a family barristers day in the life breaking barriers, turning disadvantage into advantage, and fighting for abuse victims
The court backlog, remote hearings and exodus of criminal advocates due to poor remuneration are all linked and so must be the solutions, writes HH Nigel Lithman QC
.tmb-carlisting.jpg?sfvrsn=709676a_1){kind=logo}