*/
There is no suspense in inevitability.
I have been lucky, but the statistics were against me. It was going to happen, it was bound to happen and it finally did happen. Last month, I was in the middle of addressing a very pleasant judge when I noticed that my mobile phone was behaving oddly.
Those little communication boxes have sabotaged society far more effectively than an army of foreign agents. It is impossible to have a conversation with anyone under 70 without their hands drifting inexorably to the dreaded mobile. I have noticed the more junior tenants can even start laughing or frowning inappropriately in the middle of my anecdotes, not because of anything I have said, but as a result of some text or posting that has caught their eye. A few will say ‘sorry, I must just look at this…’, but most simply carry on regardless. What is even worse is that these contraptions make one susceptible to contact anywhere and anytime and we seem unable simply to ignore them. Of course, I am as guilty as the rest…
When we come to the courts, this mixture of frustration, annoyance and need reaches a somewhat illogical climax. Once mobiles had emerged as one of those things everyone had to have, the Court Service leapt into action and banned them. I pride myself on having successfully challenged the legality of this ban with a testy usher. I had looked up the relevant law and found that only the use of phones and cameras in court could be prevented and within 24 hours all the notices had been changed to reflect the true position. I always say it was my intervention that changed everything, but it was probably a coincidence.
This rule has now evolved into something more tangled. I was stopped in the street once by a man who had been on the jury of the case in which I had just been defending. I told him firmly I couldn’t talk about the case, but it wasn’t the case that was on his mind. ‘What gets me, mate,’ he said, ‘is how we get yelled at when our phones go off in court but you barristers are on them the whole time.’ That anomaly had crossed my mind before, although of course we are not using them for oral conversations – usually. Sitting as a Recorder, I had been just about to yell at some poor prosecutor for appearing actually to be texting on the phone while addressing me, when I realised he was really looking up something in Archbold which he had downloaded on to his phone. Also, it is convenient to have one’s junior message towards lunchtime with the sandwich menu…
Still, mine should not have been on my lectern. Its vibration was very audible but what was more peculiar was that it seemed be radiating a red light in a circular pulse. It made me jump and then I just stared at it in horror. The judge seemed less transfixed. ‘You’ve been pinged, Mr Byfield.’ ‘Pinged?’ I enquired. ‘You appear to have been in close contact with someone who has recently tested positive for COVID.’ ‘What do I do?’ I asked. ‘You go straight to prison without passing ‘GO’ and without collecting £200.’ He smiled. ‘You need to go home and stay there for as long as the App says.’ ‘Do I have to?’ I asked. ‘Well,’ said the judge, ‘that’s a moot point. It may be you are simply advised to go home and stay there if the warning comes only from the App, but it doesn’t matter because Security won’t let you in anyway if you answer their questions truthfully.’ I asked if I should finish my submission. ‘No, I think you have already persuaded me,’ he replied. ‘That was a bit of luck,’ my client said later. ‘Saved by COVID.’
I have at last finished my isolation. It was worse than the original lockdown. I was not even allowed out. I could not work out whether I liked the return to peace and quiet and hours of films on Talking Pictures, or whether I had re-entered one of Dante’s Circles of Hell. My last day of isolation was also the occasion of Hetty Briar-Pitt’s ‘fête-en-champetre’ with champagne, summer cup and canapés. I told her I thought I was perfectly safe to come as I had isolated for ten days, was double vaccinated and had already had the wretched illness. ‘Sorry,’ said Hetty, and added, as perhaps I should have predicted, ‘It’s not the other guests I care about. It’s my horses. I don’t want you passing anything on to them.’
There is no suspense in inevitability.
I have been lucky, but the statistics were against me. It was going to happen, it was bound to happen and it finally did happen. Last month, I was in the middle of addressing a very pleasant judge when I noticed that my mobile phone was behaving oddly.
Those little communication boxes have sabotaged society far more effectively than an army of foreign agents. It is impossible to have a conversation with anyone under 70 without their hands drifting inexorably to the dreaded mobile. I have noticed the more junior tenants can even start laughing or frowning inappropriately in the middle of my anecdotes, not because of anything I have said, but as a result of some text or posting that has caught their eye. A few will say ‘sorry, I must just look at this…’, but most simply carry on regardless. What is even worse is that these contraptions make one susceptible to contact anywhere and anytime and we seem unable simply to ignore them. Of course, I am as guilty as the rest…
When we come to the courts, this mixture of frustration, annoyance and need reaches a somewhat illogical climax. Once mobiles had emerged as one of those things everyone had to have, the Court Service leapt into action and banned them. I pride myself on having successfully challenged the legality of this ban with a testy usher. I had looked up the relevant law and found that only the use of phones and cameras in court could be prevented and within 24 hours all the notices had been changed to reflect the true position. I always say it was my intervention that changed everything, but it was probably a coincidence.
This rule has now evolved into something more tangled. I was stopped in the street once by a man who had been on the jury of the case in which I had just been defending. I told him firmly I couldn’t talk about the case, but it wasn’t the case that was on his mind. ‘What gets me, mate,’ he said, ‘is how we get yelled at when our phones go off in court but you barristers are on them the whole time.’ That anomaly had crossed my mind before, although of course we are not using them for oral conversations – usually. Sitting as a Recorder, I had been just about to yell at some poor prosecutor for appearing actually to be texting on the phone while addressing me, when I realised he was really looking up something in Archbold which he had downloaded on to his phone. Also, it is convenient to have one’s junior message towards lunchtime with the sandwich menu…
Still, mine should not have been on my lectern. Its vibration was very audible but what was more peculiar was that it seemed be radiating a red light in a circular pulse. It made me jump and then I just stared at it in horror. The judge seemed less transfixed. ‘You’ve been pinged, Mr Byfield.’ ‘Pinged?’ I enquired. ‘You appear to have been in close contact with someone who has recently tested positive for COVID.’ ‘What do I do?’ I asked. ‘You go straight to prison without passing ‘GO’ and without collecting £200.’ He smiled. ‘You need to go home and stay there for as long as the App says.’ ‘Do I have to?’ I asked. ‘Well,’ said the judge, ‘that’s a moot point. It may be you are simply advised to go home and stay there if the warning comes only from the App, but it doesn’t matter because Security won’t let you in anyway if you answer their questions truthfully.’ I asked if I should finish my submission. ‘No, I think you have already persuaded me,’ he replied. ‘That was a bit of luck,’ my client said later. ‘Saved by COVID.’
I have at last finished my isolation. It was worse than the original lockdown. I was not even allowed out. I could not work out whether I liked the return to peace and quiet and hours of films on Talking Pictures, or whether I had re-entered one of Dante’s Circles of Hell. My last day of isolation was also the occasion of Hetty Briar-Pitt’s ‘fête-en-champetre’ with champagne, summer cup and canapés. I told her I thought I was perfectly safe to come as I had isolated for ten days, was double vaccinated and had already had the wretched illness. ‘Sorry,’ said Hetty, and added, as perhaps I should have predicted, ‘It’s not the other guests I care about. It’s my horses. I don’t want you passing anything on to them.’
Our call for sufficient resources for the justice system and for the Bar to scrutinise the BSB’s latest consultation
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses alcohol testing for the Family Court
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth explains how to make sure you are investing suitably, and in your long-term interests
In conversation with Matthew Bland, Lincoln’s Inn Library
Millicent Wild of 5 Essex Chambers describes her pupillage experience
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth explores some key steps to take when starting out as a barrister in order to secure your financial future
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Inspiring and diverse candidates are being sought for the Attorney General’s Regional A, B and C Panels - recruitment closes at noon on 10 October 2024
Expectations, experiences and survival tips – some of the things I wished I had known (or applied) when I was starting pupillage. By Chelsea Brooke-Ward
If you are in/about to start pupillage, you will soon be facing the pupillage stage assessment in professional ethics. Jane Hutton and Patrick Ryan outline exam format and tactics
In a two-part opinion series, James Onalaja considers the International Criminal Court Prosecutor’s requests for arrest warrants in the controversial Israel-Palestine situation