*/
The question is who, not what, we are waiting for
Recently, I asked a mini-pupil what she had made of the experience. I expected her to say something like ‘it was very boring’, or ‘why was the case taking so long?’ In fact, the question she asked was ‘why is there so much waiting?’ I gave her the stock explanation, but thought to myself that somehow it was unsatisfactory. Next day, I had to leave court for a hospital ‘procedure’. I was told to arrive there at 10.30am and that the procedure would take half an hour. I did arrive at 10.30am and the procedure did take half an hour although, sadly, the two time periods were not aligned. It started with a series of excuses about the lack of nurses and moved to the explanation that there wasn’t a room. By midday I noticed that several nurses seemed to lack an immediate job and I could see three open doors revealing vacant rooms.
I enquired of the senior sister who told me that she had ‘better tell me the truth’. This was that they were having a great deal of difficulty in getting the pharmaceutical department to send out the medication shortly to be plunged into my circulatory system. They too were understaffed and in any event the hospital was of sufficient size to mean that it was an empire in which one satrap did not cross into the territory of another. I went from bad temper to resignation then to boredom and finally numbness.
Whilst recovering in the procedure room afterwards, at 7pm, with a surprisingly decent cup of coffee and a chicken sandwich, I wondered whether users of the court system had an experience that was any different from mine at the hospital: huge amounts of delay accompanied by increasingly thin explanations for what was occurring. Nowadays, in short cases, the inevitable explanation is that the CPS has not attended to a million things and the witnesses, including the defendant, can only spare us very specific amounts of time at their convenience. In long cases, the prosecution inevitably has numerous outstanding disclosure duties to perform and the defence is not feeling overly prepared itself.
‘Every bad situation is a blues song waiting to happen’
– Amy Winehouse
However, my day at the hospital did at least allow me to see some of the factors causing delay to which over-familiarity with the legal system had blinded me. First, it is not what you are waiting for but whom that matters. On days when the consultant is performing the actual procedure it happens in the appointed place at the appointed time. When a nurse is doing it, it is at the whim of the tidal flow of an imperial entity. Going privately gives you a step or two up on the ladder but, on the hospital game board, this only gets you to the square that gives you sandwiches, coffee and biscuits.
The legal system is similar but with a food chain something like this: the jury, having been bullied, mistreated, ignored and patronised for centuries, is now sacrosanct in the system. A note from the jury is a summons to Mount Sinai. Next is the convenience of the prosecution witnesses. Professional witnesses, the complainant and those suffering from disabling conditions come very much first, but even an ordinary full-throttled moaning one is likely to have the court’s ear. Who wants to have to resort to the hearsay provisions in dubious circumstances? Defence witnesses are better treated than before although they may not detect it. Next comes the usher.
Although this often underrated and overlooked official would not claim the distinction, the cognoscenti appreciate that the usher, like a clerk, sergeant-major or scout at the ancient universities can make a deal of difference to his or her governor’s life. Somewhat lower than expected in the ratings is the judge: High Court, Resident, Circuit Judge and Recorder, although the Recorder really ranks no higher than prosecution counsel. Defence advocates are just a pace behind. The defendant is bottom, unless in person, when his status will veer up and down the range according to his volatility. And then there are last-minute entrants, such as dock officers, security staff and ‘listing’ who can gallop like the four horsemen of the Apocalypse into any part of the mosaic. The court clerk is literally nowhere, sadly.
Having completed this analysis, I folded my arms behind my head, strictly against advice, and allowed the infused nutrients to give me their succour and ended with a thought that had occurred to me many, many times before. Our medical consultant cousins still have it mighty cushy.
Recently, I asked a mini-pupil what she had made of the experience. I expected her to say something like ‘it was very boring’, or ‘why was the case taking so long?’ In fact, the question she asked was ‘why is there so much waiting?’ I gave her the stock explanation, but thought to myself that somehow it was unsatisfactory. Next day, I had to leave court for a hospital ‘procedure’. I was told to arrive there at 10.30am and that the procedure would take half an hour. I did arrive at 10.30am and the procedure did take half an hour although, sadly, the two time periods were not aligned. It started with a series of excuses about the lack of nurses and moved to the explanation that there wasn’t a room. By midday I noticed that several nurses seemed to lack an immediate job and I could see three open doors revealing vacant rooms.
I enquired of the senior sister who told me that she had ‘better tell me the truth’. This was that they were having a great deal of difficulty in getting the pharmaceutical department to send out the medication shortly to be plunged into my circulatory system. They too were understaffed and in any event the hospital was of sufficient size to mean that it was an empire in which one satrap did not cross into the territory of another. I went from bad temper to resignation then to boredom and finally numbness.
Whilst recovering in the procedure room afterwards, at 7pm, with a surprisingly decent cup of coffee and a chicken sandwich, I wondered whether users of the court system had an experience that was any different from mine at the hospital: huge amounts of delay accompanied by increasingly thin explanations for what was occurring. Nowadays, in short cases, the inevitable explanation is that the CPS has not attended to a million things and the witnesses, including the defendant, can only spare us very specific amounts of time at their convenience. In long cases, the prosecution inevitably has numerous outstanding disclosure duties to perform and the defence is not feeling overly prepared itself.
‘Every bad situation is a blues song waiting to happen’
– Amy Winehouse
However, my day at the hospital did at least allow me to see some of the factors causing delay to which over-familiarity with the legal system had blinded me. First, it is not what you are waiting for but whom that matters. On days when the consultant is performing the actual procedure it happens in the appointed place at the appointed time. When a nurse is doing it, it is at the whim of the tidal flow of an imperial entity. Going privately gives you a step or two up on the ladder but, on the hospital game board, this only gets you to the square that gives you sandwiches, coffee and biscuits.
The legal system is similar but with a food chain something like this: the jury, having been bullied, mistreated, ignored and patronised for centuries, is now sacrosanct in the system. A note from the jury is a summons to Mount Sinai. Next is the convenience of the prosecution witnesses. Professional witnesses, the complainant and those suffering from disabling conditions come very much first, but even an ordinary full-throttled moaning one is likely to have the court’s ear. Who wants to have to resort to the hearsay provisions in dubious circumstances? Defence witnesses are better treated than before although they may not detect it. Next comes the usher.
Although this often underrated and overlooked official would not claim the distinction, the cognoscenti appreciate that the usher, like a clerk, sergeant-major or scout at the ancient universities can make a deal of difference to his or her governor’s life. Somewhat lower than expected in the ratings is the judge: High Court, Resident, Circuit Judge and Recorder, although the Recorder really ranks no higher than prosecution counsel. Defence advocates are just a pace behind. The defendant is bottom, unless in person, when his status will veer up and down the range according to his volatility. And then there are last-minute entrants, such as dock officers, security staff and ‘listing’ who can gallop like the four horsemen of the Apocalypse into any part of the mosaic. The court clerk is literally nowhere, sadly.
Having completed this analysis, I folded my arms behind my head, strictly against advice, and allowed the infused nutrients to give me their succour and ended with a thought that had occurred to me many, many times before. Our medical consultant cousins still have it mighty cushy.
The question is who, not what, we are waiting for
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt