*/
The foolish re-introduction of an already silly idea
Like a film noire ... I remembered strange wraith-like creatures, resembling my colleagues, entering a Crown court robing room at 4.30pm announcing they were there to start ‘the evening shift’ – Shareca Cole,Carpel Tunnel
We had a day off today in a grindingly long trial. We were profoundly relieved to hear that a juror had some gastric upset. ‘Not too severe, we hope?’ asked prosecuting counsel of the judge. ‘I think not,’ came the judicial reply. The judge was the only one to look put out and that could have been consummate acting. For the rest of us it was blessed freedom. Hair appointments were booked. Car services were arranged. Medical appointments were sought and I rang the plumber to deal with my ever-leaking shower. Everyone said they would look in to Chambers to uncover the customary mountain of mail in our pigeon-holes. It was an opportunity, rare in a long case, to do the ordinary things of life that the employed manage by sneaking off for an hour or two, taking a sickie or, in extremis, using up a day’s holiday.
When I came into Chambers I was greeted by a rush of members all wanting me to electronically sign an online petition, intervene personally with a Liz Truss, apparently the Lord Chancellor; ring my contacts at the Bar Council or just do ‘something’. I was desperately trying to work out what the fuss was about when Hetty Briar-Pitt, who regards humans as things you have contact with when there is no horse around, started gabbling some incoherent nonsense at me about her domestic arrangements. ‘Do you know what happens,’ she said, ‘when they don’t get fed?’ It took me a moment to realise that she was referring to her four-legged brood and not her husband, Ernst Pennington, who was currently sitting in the Divisional Court and generally dined at his club.
Before I could think of a holding reply, Andrew, our senior clerk, rescued me. ‘Urgent call, sir! In the Admin Room!’ I shot in to a tiny room mostly filled with over-sized printers and Andrew joined me 30 seconds later through another door which led to the rear of the Clerks’ Room. It reminded me of those Whitehall farces when I was a child and I half-expected Brian Rix to enter, without his trousers, pursued by an aggrieved husband who had mistaken him for his wife’s lover. ‘It’s those new longer working days, sir.’ It did not immediately ring a bell – such is the suspended animation of life in the outside world during a long trial – but after he thrust into my hands details of some nonsensical new efficiency plan by the Ministry of (Bad) Jokes, some light began to dawn. ‘Not this again,’ I moaned. ‘Do you remember the last incarnation of this plan?’ ‘You did mention it, sir,’ said Andrew.
My mind went wobbly, like the screen in a film noire before a character reveals past events, and I remembered from a few years ago strange wraith-like creatures, resembling my colleagues, entering a Crown court robing room at around 4.30pm announcing they were there to start ‘the evening shift’. Of course, no case was ever ready; the judge would adjourn everything at the drop of a hat; defendants on bail did not attend, later saying that had not understood the solicitor’s strange message about timing, and those in custody were whisked off by a prison on the dot of 5.30pm – with staff citing contractual provisions and their alleged concern that the prisoner got a hot meal. The whole thing was an unmitigated fiasco and it was allowed to die a quiet death. Perhaps the turnover at the Ministry is such that no-one remembers the scheme now. It certainly is unlikely to have been retained in the archives.
The particular vice of the night-shift is if the listing is only revealed the day before because the case had no fixed time and date and was only in a warned list. Professional rules could forbid a late return of the brief even assuming any colleague would take it. Thus, family and social engagements would be wrecked and it would be enough to put another chunk of aspiring barristers off the criminal Bar. How would Liz Truss react if her evening appointments were scheduled the day before and were obligatory?
I left Chambers and returned home to be greeted by the plumber with my showerhead in his hand. ‘Bit worse than we thought, Mr B, the whole pipe is limescaled – going to take a bit longer.’ ‘Oh well,’ I said, ‘que sera, sera.’ The plumber looked slightly bemused. ‘Don’t know about that sir, but it will be double time after 6pm.’
We had a day off today in a grindingly long trial. We were profoundly relieved to hear that a juror had some gastric upset. ‘Not too severe, we hope?’ asked prosecuting counsel of the judge. ‘I think not,’ came the judicial reply. The judge was the only one to look put out and that could have been consummate acting. For the rest of us it was blessed freedom. Hair appointments were booked. Car services were arranged. Medical appointments were sought and I rang the plumber to deal with my ever-leaking shower. Everyone said they would look in to Chambers to uncover the customary mountain of mail in our pigeon-holes. It was an opportunity, rare in a long case, to do the ordinary things of life that the employed manage by sneaking off for an hour or two, taking a sickie or, in extremis, using up a day’s holiday.
When I came into Chambers I was greeted by a rush of members all wanting me to electronically sign an online petition, intervene personally with a Liz Truss, apparently the Lord Chancellor; ring my contacts at the Bar Council or just do ‘something’. I was desperately trying to work out what the fuss was about when Hetty Briar-Pitt, who regards humans as things you have contact with when there is no horse around, started gabbling some incoherent nonsense at me about her domestic arrangements. ‘Do you know what happens,’ she said, ‘when they don’t get fed?’ It took me a moment to realise that she was referring to her four-legged brood and not her husband, Ernst Pennington, who was currently sitting in the Divisional Court and generally dined at his club.
Before I could think of a holding reply, Andrew, our senior clerk, rescued me. ‘Urgent call, sir! In the Admin Room!’ I shot in to a tiny room mostly filled with over-sized printers and Andrew joined me 30 seconds later through another door which led to the rear of the Clerks’ Room. It reminded me of those Whitehall farces when I was a child and I half-expected Brian Rix to enter, without his trousers, pursued by an aggrieved husband who had mistaken him for his wife’s lover. ‘It’s those new longer working days, sir.’ It did not immediately ring a bell – such is the suspended animation of life in the outside world during a long trial – but after he thrust into my hands details of some nonsensical new efficiency plan by the Ministry of (Bad) Jokes, some light began to dawn. ‘Not this again,’ I moaned. ‘Do you remember the last incarnation of this plan?’ ‘You did mention it, sir,’ said Andrew.
My mind went wobbly, like the screen in a film noire before a character reveals past events, and I remembered from a few years ago strange wraith-like creatures, resembling my colleagues, entering a Crown court robing room at around 4.30pm announcing they were there to start ‘the evening shift’. Of course, no case was ever ready; the judge would adjourn everything at the drop of a hat; defendants on bail did not attend, later saying that had not understood the solicitor’s strange message about timing, and those in custody were whisked off by a prison on the dot of 5.30pm – with staff citing contractual provisions and their alleged concern that the prisoner got a hot meal. The whole thing was an unmitigated fiasco and it was allowed to die a quiet death. Perhaps the turnover at the Ministry is such that no-one remembers the scheme now. It certainly is unlikely to have been retained in the archives.
The particular vice of the night-shift is if the listing is only revealed the day before because the case had no fixed time and date and was only in a warned list. Professional rules could forbid a late return of the brief even assuming any colleague would take it. Thus, family and social engagements would be wrecked and it would be enough to put another chunk of aspiring barristers off the criminal Bar. How would Liz Truss react if her evening appointments were scheduled the day before and were obligatory?
I left Chambers and returned home to be greeted by the plumber with my showerhead in his hand. ‘Bit worse than we thought, Mr B, the whole pipe is limescaled – going to take a bit longer.’ ‘Oh well,’ I said, ‘que sera, sera.’ The plumber looked slightly bemused. ‘Don’t know about that sir, but it will be double time after 6pm.’
The foolish re-introduction of an already silly idea
Like a film noire... I remembered strange wraith-like creatures, resembling my colleagues, entering a Crown court robing room at 4.30pm announcing they were there to start ‘the evening shift’ – Shareca Cole,Carpel Tunnel
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
In an era of patient-centred care and growing concern over misconduct in medical settings, why do women still lack the right to choose women consultants for examination and treatment? Charles Davey investigates
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC