*/
Time for confession
Memory is the mother of all wisdom.
One unexpected side effect of lockdown is that people are contacting long-lost friends and acquaintances. A day or two ago, I had finished a specially commissioned virtual talk to Chambers entitled ‘Excellence in Advocacy’. Numbers were better than expected, although Paddy Corkill did say he thought he had pressed a link to another advertised Chambers presentation – ‘My Favourite Cocktail’.
The talk actually illustrated all the worst features of advocacy, particularly as I was finding it difficult to centre my image on the screen, but there was one interesting question from a recent tenant – Anna Browne. She asked how one could deal with the cross-examination of witnesses who stuck consistently to an account that one’s client had perpetrated some awful crime against them in circumstances where they were, on the defence thesis, deliberately and determinedly incriminating an innocent person.
The effect of looking at all those faces in vivid colour on my screen caused memories of the talk to linger in my brain well after the meeting had ended. I was thinking about Anna’s question when my mobile phone rang and a voice I did not recognise said: ‘Hello William. It is William, isn’t it?’ ‘Yes,’ I replied, wondering if I was about to be asked if I had recently been involved in a motoring accident. ‘It’s Peter Davies.’ I was none the wiser. ‘Peter Davies from Heathpoint.’ I certainly remembered Heathpoint, an academy of learning I had attended until I was about 12. Peter Davies… yes, I remembered him. We can’t have spoken in more than half a century.
‘I got your details from Robert Wakely,’ he said. I know Robert but Peter did not expatiate on how he did. ‘How are you?’ We went through the slightly amended COVID version of this standard enquiry. ‘My parents are both dead,’ he said. This, I thought to myself, was hardly surprising given the passage of time. Then he went on and revealed why he had called: ‘My brother and I were talking about you on a recent Skype call. Didn’t our father take your appendix out?’
Then the memory hit with an almighty thud. Mr Davies, the surgeon. He did remove my appendix. Not when we were at Heathpoint but when I had moved on to a different school about two years later.
The day had dawned bright but not cheerful. I had failed to learn some rather awkward French verbs and faced Anton Catesby, my then young and very radical French master who rather treacherously, given his communist sympathies, used to beat us if we were awarded under 80% in any piece of work. Nowadays, this teaching device would rightly cause shock and horror. I should perhaps record that at the end of that year I was bottom in French with 79 out of 100.
Anyway, in Geography, the lesson before, I faked a stomach ache so well that I was sent home and my mother called our lovely old family GP to come and see me. He could usually be relied upon to write a sick note and give you nice-tasting medicine but I had acted out of my skin and he called in a specialist. ‘I will tell him,’ I thought. ‘He doesn’t know me so it will be easier.’ Into my bedroom walked Peter’s father. I never knew he was a surgeon and the truth froze on my lips as he said. ‘Hello, young William.’ He examined me rather vigorously and pronounced, in a way that caused me to distrust doctors thereafter, that I had appendicitis. The offending organ was surgically removed the next day and I never told a soul the truth ever. My parents would have killed me. They were so worried.
‘What I was saying to my brother,’ said Peter, ‘was that dad always thought you had faked it because your appendix was perfectly normal. Had you?’ The virus had brought us here after a lifetime and for the first time in my life, I confessed. ‘Why didn’t you stop them and just tell the truth?’ he said, laughing. ‘I couldn’t, once I had started it,’ was my reply. We caught up for a little while and then parted, probably, sadly, never to speak again. I picked up the phone to Andrew, our senior clerk. ‘Andrew,’ I said, ‘is it possible to post something to that meeting we just had? I realise I can answer a question asked me by Anna Browne.’
Memory is the mother of all wisdom.
One unexpected side effect of lockdown is that people are contacting long-lost friends and acquaintances. A day or two ago, I had finished a specially commissioned virtual talk to Chambers entitled ‘Excellence in Advocacy’. Numbers were better than expected, although Paddy Corkill did say he thought he had pressed a link to another advertised Chambers presentation – ‘My Favourite Cocktail’.
The talk actually illustrated all the worst features of advocacy, particularly as I was finding it difficult to centre my image on the screen, but there was one interesting question from a recent tenant – Anna Browne. She asked how one could deal with the cross-examination of witnesses who stuck consistently to an account that one’s client had perpetrated some awful crime against them in circumstances where they were, on the defence thesis, deliberately and determinedly incriminating an innocent person.
The effect of looking at all those faces in vivid colour on my screen caused memories of the talk to linger in my brain well after the meeting had ended. I was thinking about Anna’s question when my mobile phone rang and a voice I did not recognise said: ‘Hello William. It is William, isn’t it?’ ‘Yes,’ I replied, wondering if I was about to be asked if I had recently been involved in a motoring accident. ‘It’s Peter Davies.’ I was none the wiser. ‘Peter Davies from Heathpoint.’ I certainly remembered Heathpoint, an academy of learning I had attended until I was about 12. Peter Davies… yes, I remembered him. We can’t have spoken in more than half a century.
‘I got your details from Robert Wakely,’ he said. I know Robert but Peter did not expatiate on how he did. ‘How are you?’ We went through the slightly amended COVID version of this standard enquiry. ‘My parents are both dead,’ he said. This, I thought to myself, was hardly surprising given the passage of time. Then he went on and revealed why he had called: ‘My brother and I were talking about you on a recent Skype call. Didn’t our father take your appendix out?’
Then the memory hit with an almighty thud. Mr Davies, the surgeon. He did remove my appendix. Not when we were at Heathpoint but when I had moved on to a different school about two years later.
The day had dawned bright but not cheerful. I had failed to learn some rather awkward French verbs and faced Anton Catesby, my then young and very radical French master who rather treacherously, given his communist sympathies, used to beat us if we were awarded under 80% in any piece of work. Nowadays, this teaching device would rightly cause shock and horror. I should perhaps record that at the end of that year I was bottom in French with 79 out of 100.
Anyway, in Geography, the lesson before, I faked a stomach ache so well that I was sent home and my mother called our lovely old family GP to come and see me. He could usually be relied upon to write a sick note and give you nice-tasting medicine but I had acted out of my skin and he called in a specialist. ‘I will tell him,’ I thought. ‘He doesn’t know me so it will be easier.’ Into my bedroom walked Peter’s father. I never knew he was a surgeon and the truth froze on my lips as he said. ‘Hello, young William.’ He examined me rather vigorously and pronounced, in a way that caused me to distrust doctors thereafter, that I had appendicitis. The offending organ was surgically removed the next day and I never told a soul the truth ever. My parents would have killed me. They were so worried.
‘What I was saying to my brother,’ said Peter, ‘was that dad always thought you had faked it because your appendix was perfectly normal. Had you?’ The virus had brought us here after a lifetime and for the first time in my life, I confessed. ‘Why didn’t you stop them and just tell the truth?’ he said, laughing. ‘I couldn’t, once I had started it,’ was my reply. We caught up for a little while and then parted, probably, sadly, never to speak again. I picked up the phone to Andrew, our senior clerk. ‘Andrew,’ I said, ‘is it possible to post something to that meeting we just had? I realise I can answer a question asked me by Anna Browne.’
Time for confession
On both fronts – representing the Bar’s interests and protecting the rule of law
Ashley Hodgkinson looks at drug testing methods and some of the most common ways people try to cheat a drug test
Clerksroom Chambers has recruited Matthew Wildish from 3 Paper Buildings (3PB) to a newly created position of Director of Clerking. Matthew joined the team at Clerksroom on 1 June
... have you seen through yours? asks Julian Morgan
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Clerksroom Chambers has recruited Matthew Wildish from 3 Paper Buildings (3PB) to a newly created position of Director of Clerking. Matthew joined the team at Clerksroom on 1 June
In this tale of hope, success really has been the best revenge! A difficult journey teaches Rehana Azib QC invaluable lessons along the way
This article is not designed to offend the Judiciary but the quiet word has only taken us so far it is time concerns were recorded formally, says the first set to introduce an external bullying policy By Eleanor Laws QC, Oliver Mosley and Kyan Pucks
Having represented many Davids against many Goliaths over a 30+year career at the publicly funded Bar, renowned silk Professor Leslie Thomas QC critically assesses what the Human Rights Act currently under challenge has done for coronial law and equality of arms
The Chief Inspector of the CPS knows first-hand the difficulties prosecutors face but is no pushover. He talks to Anthony Inglese CB about Operation Soteria, putting victims and cooperation at the heart of criminal justice reform, and his unique and life-changing career prosecuting the crime of all crimes, genocide