*/
Courts
The offence of scandalising the court looks soon to be relegated to history.
A form of contempt, the offence covers conduct likely to undermine public confidence in the administration of justice, such as publication of statements attacking the judiciary.
Following a consultation last year, the Law Commission brought forward publication of its recommendation in favour of abolishing the offence, in December 2012. This was released just in advance of the House of Lords debate, and acceptance of, the necessary amendment to the Crime and Courts Bill.
There has been a lack of clarity surrounding the exact nature of the offence, defences available and compatibility with freedom of expression and human rights. The last successful prosecution for scandalising the court in England and Wales was in 1931. It has been used more recently in other common law jurisdictions, most notably Attorney General for Northern Ireland v Peter Hain MP in Northern Ireland in spring 2012.
The Bill continues its passage through the House of Commons.
A form of contempt, the offence covers conduct likely to undermine public confidence in the administration of justice, such as publication of statements attacking the judiciary.
Following a consultation last year, the Law Commission brought forward publication of its recommendation in favour of abolishing the offence, in December 2012. This was released just in advance of the House of Lords debate, and acceptance of, the necessary amendment to the Crime and Courts Bill.
There has been a lack of clarity surrounding the exact nature of the offence, defences available and compatibility with freedom of expression and human rights. The last successful prosecution for scandalising the court in England and Wales was in 1931. It has been used more recently in other common law jurisdictions, most notably Attorney General for Northern Ireland v Peter Hain MP in Northern Ireland in spring 2012.
The Bill continues its passage through the House of Commons.
Courts
The offence of scandalising the court looks soon to be relegated to history.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
