*/
Courts
The offence of scandalising the court looks soon to be relegated to history.
A form of contempt, the offence covers conduct likely to undermine public confidence in the administration of justice, such as publication of statements attacking the judiciary.
Following a consultation last year, the Law Commission brought forward publication of its recommendation in favour of abolishing the offence, in December 2012. This was released just in advance of the House of Lords debate, and acceptance of, the necessary amendment to the Crime and Courts Bill.
There has been a lack of clarity surrounding the exact nature of the offence, defences available and compatibility with freedom of expression and human rights. The last successful prosecution for scandalising the court in England and Wales was in 1931. It has been used more recently in other common law jurisdictions, most notably Attorney General for Northern Ireland v Peter Hain MP in Northern Ireland in spring 2012.
The Bill continues its passage through the House of Commons.
A form of contempt, the offence covers conduct likely to undermine public confidence in the administration of justice, such as publication of statements attacking the judiciary.
Following a consultation last year, the Law Commission brought forward publication of its recommendation in favour of abolishing the offence, in December 2012. This was released just in advance of the House of Lords debate, and acceptance of, the necessary amendment to the Crime and Courts Bill.
There has been a lack of clarity surrounding the exact nature of the offence, defences available and compatibility with freedom of expression and human rights. The last successful prosecution for scandalising the court in England and Wales was in 1931. It has been used more recently in other common law jurisdictions, most notably Attorney General for Northern Ireland v Peter Hain MP in Northern Ireland in spring 2012.
The Bill continues its passage through the House of Commons.
Courts
The offence of scandalising the court looks soon to be relegated to history.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
