*/
THE potential human cost of denying vulnerable families and children access to expert legal support in care and related cases was revealed in a dossier of case studies, showing the difficulties which are already being encountered by family barristers as they seek to represent their clients to the best of their abilities.
The Family Law Bar Association (FLBA) submitted the case studies to the Ministry of Justice, which is overseeing deep cuts to funding support for vulnerable families and children as part of a major attack of the legal aid system. The FLBA is campaigning for no further cuts in a system which is already creaking under the strain of societal change and which faces greater demands for intervention to protect children at risk in the wake of Baby P.
The case studies demonstrate the importance of appropriate representation for those going through the family courts. The FLBA argues it is vital that those who are going through what is a difficult process are supported by barristers whose level of seniority and expertise matches the gravity of the particular case. It is arguing for a system where fixed fees paid to barristers are graduated to reflect the complexity and demands of the case.
The case studies include:
Commenting on the case studies, Lucy Theis QC, the Chair of the Family Law Bar Association, said:
‘These case studies, provided by barristers working at the front line of the family justice system, amply demonstrate the very real difference their advocacy skills can make and the problems which will be caused by the proposed cuts to family legal aid. Family barristers are expert family advocates who work long hours and are absolutely committed to working in the best interests of their clients. They are not fat cats, they are public servants whose work is a vital part of an effective and fair family justice system; there is no doubt that the proposed cuts to family legal aid will increase the risk of miscarriages of justice. The Family Law Bar Association would like to see the proposed fixed fee scheme replaced by a graduated fee scheme, which rewards the complexity of the case rather than what is proposed, which grossly over-rewards the less complex cases at the expense of the more complex ones. Our proposals will not increase the outgoings from the public purse, and they will avoid the consequences of an ill-thought-through fixed fee scheme which puts the most vulnerable in our society at increased risk of harm.’ Desmond Browne QC, the Chairman of the Bar, said: ‘Nobody reading these studies can be left in any doubt about the expertise and commitment of the family law bar.
It will be disastrous for the family justice system if family law barristers, and law students considering a career in this field, are deterred from doing so by cuts which are so savage that they make practice uneconomic. The Bar Council has been working determinedly to increase diversity at the Bar, and eventually on the Bench. All this work will be wasted if cuts in fees on the scale proposed drive women and ethnic minority practitioners away from doing publicly funded work. Their devotion to this area of practice is universally acknowledged.’ Recent research has shown beyond any doubt that already the existing pressure on the legal aid budget has resulted in fewer and fewer solicitors and barristers being willing to do this work. In the absence of local firms to provide advice, vulnerable clients are being forced to seek representation from solicitors often hours away. The latest proposals for cuts can only exacerbate the current legal aid deserts. Experienced barristers are needed to take on the complex cases where women and children are at risk of abuse. Recent tragedies have shown the fatal risks if these cases are not properly conducted. Supported by the NSPCC, who share our concern about the risks, we will be renewing our plea to the LSC and to Ministers to think again.’
The case studies demonstrate the importance of appropriate representation for those going through the family courts. The FLBA argues it is vital that those who are going through what is a difficult process are supported by barristers whose level of seniority and expertise matches the gravity of the particular case. It is arguing for a system where fixed fees paid to barristers are graduated to reflect the complexity and demands of the case.
The case studies include:
Commenting on the case studies, Lucy Theis QC, the Chair of the Family Law Bar Association, said:
‘These case studies, provided by barristers working at the front line of the family justice system, amply demonstrate the very real difference their advocacy skills can make and the problems which will be caused by the proposed cuts to family legal aid. Family barristers are expert family advocates who work long hours and are absolutely committed to working in the best interests of their clients. They are not fat cats, they are public servants whose work is a vital part of an effective and fair family justice system; there is no doubt that the proposed cuts to family legal aid will increase the risk of miscarriages of justice. The Family Law Bar Association would like to see the proposed fixed fee scheme replaced by a graduated fee scheme, which rewards the complexity of the case rather than what is proposed, which grossly over-rewards the less complex cases at the expense of the more complex ones. Our proposals will not increase the outgoings from the public purse, and they will avoid the consequences of an ill-thought-through fixed fee scheme which puts the most vulnerable in our society at increased risk of harm.’ Desmond Browne QC, the Chairman of the Bar, said: ‘Nobody reading these studies can be left in any doubt about the expertise and commitment of the family law bar.
It will be disastrous for the family justice system if family law barristers, and law students considering a career in this field, are deterred from doing so by cuts which are so savage that they make practice uneconomic. The Bar Council has been working determinedly to increase diversity at the Bar, and eventually on the Bench. All this work will be wasted if cuts in fees on the scale proposed drive women and ethnic minority practitioners away from doing publicly funded work. Their devotion to this area of practice is universally acknowledged.’ Recent research has shown beyond any doubt that already the existing pressure on the legal aid budget has resulted in fewer and fewer solicitors and barristers being willing to do this work. In the absence of local firms to provide advice, vulnerable clients are being forced to seek representation from solicitors often hours away. The latest proposals for cuts can only exacerbate the current legal aid deserts. Experienced barristers are needed to take on the complex cases where women and children are at risk of abuse. Recent tragedies have shown the fatal risks if these cases are not properly conducted. Supported by the NSPCC, who share our concern about the risks, we will be renewing our plea to the LSC and to Ministers to think again.’
THE potential human cost of denying vulnerable families and children access to expert legal support in care and related cases was revealed in a dossier of case studies, showing the difficulties which are already being encountered by family barristers as they seek to represent their clients to the best of their abilities.
The Family Law Bar Association (FLBA) submitted the case studies to the Ministry of Justice, which is overseeing deep cuts to funding support for vulnerable families and children as part of a major attack of the legal aid system. The FLBA is campaigning for no further cuts in a system which is already creaking under the strain of societal change and which faces greater demands for intervention to protect children at risk in the wake of Baby P.
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
If the Bar cannot define and prohibit bullying behaviour, what chance do we have of persuading the Judiciary to do so? Darren Howe QC and Professor Jo Delahunty QC's call to action on codification plus suggested strategies for dealing with bullying from the Bar and Bench
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright