*/
The Bar Council’s recent report Bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar 2023 makes salutary reading. Drawing on data from Barristers’ Working Lives, the biennial survey of the profession, it provides evidence of a long-term systemic problem with bullying and harassment, as well as inappropriate and undermining behaviour. Nearly half (44%) of those barristers who participated in the survey had experienced or observed some form of workplace discrimination through bullying or harassment. Even to someone with over 20 years’ experience in the area of professional standards and conduct, this is shocking.
By the very nature of their roles, barristers hold a significant position in society. It should therefore be incumbent on all barristers not just to hold themselves back from discriminating. It is about setting an example by proactively promoting diversity, equality, and inclusion – in their words, ‘behaviours and actions’.
As such, the independent bullying and harassment review commissioned by the Bar Council and led by Harriet Harman KC has come at a very important moment for the profession. The Bar Council in partnership with the Bar Standards Board (BSB) now have an opportunity to promote tolerance and inclusivity as core values and re-examine the Code of Conduct to make it explicit that bullying, harassment, sexual harassment, which can manifest in racist attitudes, have no place in the profession. The Review’s reference group has significant expertise and two in particular, Professor Michael Maguire and Dr Robin James, have developed approaches to similar issues in the context of MPs’ conduct.
The BSB, under the leadership of its Chair Kathryn Stone (Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 2018-22) already has a succinct, 10-point code of conduct. Crucially, it does contain a general statement requiring barristers not to discriminate unlawfully against any person (Core Duty 8).
However, should the profession, through this review, take the opportunity to be more active and specific in its code about combating bullying, sexism and racist attitudes? I think so. Having a code of conduct that states a general opposition to discriminatory attitudes is seldom sufficient, as appears clearly to be the case given the volume of cases involving allegations of bullying, racism and misogyny levelled at members of the profession.
The Bar should go significantly further than the sentiments set out in the current code. In addition to Core Duty 8, the Bar Council could promote a change to the BSB Code of Conduct that could incorporate specifically the values of anti-racism and anti-sexism with a specific clause for all the profession to actively promote anti-discriminatory attitudes and behaviours through the promotion of anti-racist and anti-sexist attitudes. This could be:
‘Barristers can only be effective when they inspire trust by setting a good example of anti-discriminatory attitudes and behaviours through the promotion of anti-bullying, anti-racism, anti-sexism, inclusion, and diversity.’
Should not everyone connected with the profession, not least barristers themselves, believe in and uphold anti-discriminatory values of anti-racism and anti-sexism? This is not about requiring barristers to be ‘politically correct’ or ‘woke’. Rather, these values are rooted in basic respect for one another.
Regulators often refine codes of conduct as a reaction to a seminal moment. In 1994, the ‘cash for questions’ affairs where some MPs had accepted payments in exchange for tabling questions in the Commons, acted as a catalyst for fundamental change in the way standards and conduct matters were addressed. This should be another seminal moment to stand against all forms of bullying and harassment, and demand that all barristers demonstrate this in words and actions.
In June 2024, the Bar Council announced its appointment of the Rt Hon Harriet Harman KC to chair the independent review of bullying and harassment, including sexual harassment, at the Bar. Submit your views by 27 September 2024.
The Bar Council’s recent report Bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar 2023 makes salutary reading. Drawing on data from Barristers’ Working Lives, the biennial survey of the profession, it provides evidence of a long-term systemic problem with bullying and harassment, as well as inappropriate and undermining behaviour. Nearly half (44%) of those barristers who participated in the survey had experienced or observed some form of workplace discrimination through bullying or harassment. Even to someone with over 20 years’ experience in the area of professional standards and conduct, this is shocking.
By the very nature of their roles, barristers hold a significant position in society. It should therefore be incumbent on all barristers not just to hold themselves back from discriminating. It is about setting an example by proactively promoting diversity, equality, and inclusion – in their words, ‘behaviours and actions’.
As such, the independent bullying and harassment review commissioned by the Bar Council and led by Harriet Harman KC has come at a very important moment for the profession. The Bar Council in partnership with the Bar Standards Board (BSB) now have an opportunity to promote tolerance and inclusivity as core values and re-examine the Code of Conduct to make it explicit that bullying, harassment, sexual harassment, which can manifest in racist attitudes, have no place in the profession. The Review’s reference group has significant expertise and two in particular, Professor Michael Maguire and Dr Robin James, have developed approaches to similar issues in the context of MPs’ conduct.
The BSB, under the leadership of its Chair Kathryn Stone (Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 2018-22) already has a succinct, 10-point code of conduct. Crucially, it does contain a general statement requiring barristers not to discriminate unlawfully against any person (Core Duty 8).
However, should the profession, through this review, take the opportunity to be more active and specific in its code about combating bullying, sexism and racist attitudes? I think so. Having a code of conduct that states a general opposition to discriminatory attitudes is seldom sufficient, as appears clearly to be the case given the volume of cases involving allegations of bullying, racism and misogyny levelled at members of the profession.
The Bar should go significantly further than the sentiments set out in the current code. In addition to Core Duty 8, the Bar Council could promote a change to the BSB Code of Conduct that could incorporate specifically the values of anti-racism and anti-sexism with a specific clause for all the profession to actively promote anti-discriminatory attitudes and behaviours through the promotion of anti-racist and anti-sexist attitudes. This could be:
‘Barristers can only be effective when they inspire trust by setting a good example of anti-discriminatory attitudes and behaviours through the promotion of anti-bullying, anti-racism, anti-sexism, inclusion, and diversity.’
Should not everyone connected with the profession, not least barristers themselves, believe in and uphold anti-discriminatory values of anti-racism and anti-sexism? This is not about requiring barristers to be ‘politically correct’ or ‘woke’. Rather, these values are rooted in basic respect for one another.
Regulators often refine codes of conduct as a reaction to a seminal moment. In 1994, the ‘cash for questions’ affairs where some MPs had accepted payments in exchange for tabling questions in the Commons, acted as a catalyst for fundamental change in the way standards and conduct matters were addressed. This should be another seminal moment to stand against all forms of bullying and harassment, and demand that all barristers demonstrate this in words and actions.
In June 2024, the Bar Council announced its appointment of the Rt Hon Harriet Harman KC to chair the independent review of bullying and harassment, including sexual harassment, at the Bar. Submit your views by 27 September 2024.
The Bar Council is ready to support a turn to the efficiencies that will make a difference
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
Ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC continues his series explaining the impact on barristers. In part 2, a worked example shows the specific practicalities of adapting to the new system
Resolution of the criminal justice crisis does not lie in reheating old ideas that have been roundly rejected before, say Ed Vickers KC, Faras Baloch and Katie Bacon
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar
Jury-less trial proposals threaten fairness, legitimacy and democracy without ending the backlog, writes Professor Cheryl Thomas KC (Hon), the UK’s leading expert on juries, judges and courts