*/
It is time for international agreement on a set of common principles governing the relocation of children overseas, Lord Justice Thorpe has said.
Increased air travel and the internet have made parental disputes over relocation more frequent and intense, Thorpe LJ said in a speech to London Metropolitan University in June.
He called for international consensus on the laws concerning relocation of children.
Moves to debate the issue of an international law of relocation are gathering momentum and a conference was held on the topic in Washington in March.
Thorpe LJ said uniformity of approach would help parents take responsible decisions about relocation and discourage them from abducting or unlawfully removing their children.
In his speech, he considered UK case law and the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998, acknowledging the arguments of fathers’ groups that times may have changed. For example, the courts take into account the idea that “the harmful impact on the mother is taken to be harmful to the child”, an idea which has been criticised by fathers’ groups as “matricentric and discriminatory”, he said.
“Given that the principle is not derived from expert evidence nor from many research studies in this jurisdiction the challenge cannot be lightly dismissed. The emergence of the principle needs to be seen in the context of social tides that were moving some forty years ago.”
Increased air travel and the internet have made parental disputes over relocation more frequent and intense, Thorpe LJ said in a speech to London Metropolitan University in June.
He called for international consensus on the laws concerning relocation of children.
Moves to debate the issue of an international law of relocation are gathering momentum and a conference was held on the topic in Washington in March.
Thorpe LJ said uniformity of approach would help parents take responsible decisions about relocation and discourage them from abducting or unlawfully removing their children.
In his speech, he considered UK case law and the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998, acknowledging the arguments of fathers’ groups that times may have changed. For example, the courts take into account the idea that “the harmful impact on the mother is taken to be harmful to the child”, an idea which has been criticised by fathers’ groups as “matricentric and discriminatory”, he said.
“Given that the principle is not derived from expert evidence nor from many research studies in this jurisdiction the challenge cannot be lightly dismissed. The emergence of the principle needs to be seen in the context of social tides that were moving some forty years ago.”
It is time for international agreement on a set of common principles governing the relocation of children overseas, Lord Justice Thorpe has said.
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
In the first of a new series, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth considers the fundamental need for financial protection
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Possibly, but many barristers are glad he did…
Mental health charity Mind BWW has received a £500 donation from drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs as part of its Giving Back campaign
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law is thrilled to announce its inaugural essay competition
How to navigate open source evidence in an era of deepfakes. By Professor Yvonne McDermott Rees and Professor Alexa Koenig
Brie Stevens-Hoare KC and Lyndsey de Mestre KC take a look at the difficulties women encounter during the menopause, and offer some practical tips for individuals and chambers to make things easier
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice since January 2021, is well known for his passion for access to justice and all things digital. Perhaps less widely known is the driven personality and wanderlust that lies behind this, as Anthony Inglese CB discovers
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
No-one should have to live in sub-standard accommodation, says Antony Hodari Solicitors. We are tackling the problem of bad housing with a two-pronged approach and act on behalf of tenants in both the civil and criminal courts