*/
It is time for international agreement on a set of common principles governing the relocation of children overseas, Lord Justice Thorpe has said.
Increased air travel and the internet have made parental disputes over relocation more frequent and intense, Thorpe LJ said in a speech to London Metropolitan University in June.
He called for international consensus on the laws concerning relocation of children.
Moves to debate the issue of an international law of relocation are gathering momentum and a conference was held on the topic in Washington in March.
Thorpe LJ said uniformity of approach would help parents take responsible decisions about relocation and discourage them from abducting or unlawfully removing their children.
In his speech, he considered UK case law and the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998, acknowledging the arguments of fathers’ groups that times may have changed. For example, the courts take into account the idea that “the harmful impact on the mother is taken to be harmful to the child”, an idea which has been criticised by fathers’ groups as “matricentric and discriminatory”, he said.
“Given that the principle is not derived from expert evidence nor from many research studies in this jurisdiction the challenge cannot be lightly dismissed. The emergence of the principle needs to be seen in the context of social tides that were moving some forty years ago.”
Increased air travel and the internet have made parental disputes over relocation more frequent and intense, Thorpe LJ said in a speech to London Metropolitan University in June.
He called for international consensus on the laws concerning relocation of children.
Moves to debate the issue of an international law of relocation are gathering momentum and a conference was held on the topic in Washington in March.
Thorpe LJ said uniformity of approach would help parents take responsible decisions about relocation and discourage them from abducting or unlawfully removing their children.
In his speech, he considered UK case law and the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998, acknowledging the arguments of fathers’ groups that times may have changed. For example, the courts take into account the idea that “the harmful impact on the mother is taken to be harmful to the child”, an idea which has been criticised by fathers’ groups as “matricentric and discriminatory”, he said.
“Given that the principle is not derived from expert evidence nor from many research studies in this jurisdiction the challenge cannot be lightly dismissed. The emergence of the principle needs to be seen in the context of social tides that were moving some forty years ago.”
It is time for international agreement on a set of common principles governing the relocation of children overseas, Lord Justice Thorpe has said.
Rare but real - the issue of judicial bullying
Philip N Bristow explains how to unlock your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step
With the property market witnessing significant changes since the beginning of the pandemic, Fleet Street Wealth’s Managing Director Julian Morgan considers the future of the home, the second home and the office
In partnership with the Bar Council, LexisNexis is offering up to 60% off its extensive webinar offering.
Chambers is expanding its team.
Making a move from the Bar to a career in governance: Maria Brookes outlines three good reasons to switch and how to do it
A toolkit to help you build profile, expertise and a bright future in arbitration. By James Bridgeman
Jonathan Seitler QC and Miriam Seitler discuss Carpool Case Law, the Bar today and the business development side of the job
SFOs General Counsel on the highs (and lows) of complex economic crime investigations and getting more women into fraud law. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
Thinking the unthinkable? James Hatt on reforming the court system, tackling retention and revolutionising part-time working
Rare but real - the issue of judicial bullying
