*/
One area where the COVID-19 global pandemic’s impact has been deeply felt is in national courts. As of early 2020, the potential for contagion spread made in-person court appearances impossible in many jurisdictions. For some judicial systems, interim solutions to keep dockets moving were deployed, such as virtual hearings. But many judicial systems were forced to suspend operations altogether while solutions were developed. Even in jurisdictions that could immediately implement virtual settings, this did not always allow disputes to proceed uninterrupted. In some cases, moving to a virtual forum was not a comprehensive solution. The outcome is another looming crisis for many judiciaries around the world: a compounding bottleneck of cases that now threatens to overwhelm dockets in many regions for months or years to come.
As global justice systems seek long-term solutions to alleviate the burden that they now find themselves under, many are seeing the capacity for arbitration to provide a substantial contribution. Arbitration is a mechanism that has historically supplemented and supported domestic judiciaries and has the potential to do so now in a significant way. Moving disputes, especially commercial disputes, into arbitration provides a beneficial solution to both parties and judiciaries. This is because of the autonomy arbitration gives parties in choosing not only the process by which their dispute will be resolved, but also their decision maker.
Parties in arbitration have the freedom to select arbitrators based on any factors they deem relevant and desirable, such as experience as a judge or technical expertise in a certain industry. Parties in arbitration also have the ability to agree the briefing and hearing schedule of a dispute directly with their chosen arbitrators. They need not wait in a queue to appear on a docket. In turn, when parties resolve their dispute in arbitration instead of resorting to the courts, the courts’ dockets are freed up to address matters which cannot be heard in any other forum. This in turn alleviates the burden on national courts and ensures swifter due process for all.
Parties in arbitration can proceed with their disputes independent of the courts but with the assurance that the process is legally binding and enforceable. In most jurisdictions, the validity of arbitration is not tied to specific physical venues. Parties may choose any physical location for hearings that is convenient for them, even one outside the relevant jurisdiction. They may also choose to hold hearings virtually with all parties remaining in their home locales. The location of the proceedings in arbitration will often have no bearing on the law that is applied to the substantive dispute, nor on the enforceability of a resulting award.
For commercial disputes arising during the pandemic, arbitration has become an increasingly attractive option. But for commercial disputes that had already entered litigation and were stalled by the pandemic, arbitration may offer solutions to these parties as well. Parties may agree to move their existing disputes from litigation into arbitration on the condition that the arbitrator adopt any decisions already made by the courts. Parties may also choose to selectively define the substantive issues the arbitrator may consider. Parties may even choose a retired commercial judge or counsel with extensive commercial litigation experience as their arbitrator to ensure a cohesive transition from litigation to arbitration.
The due process concern that ‘justice delayed is justice denied’ has rarely been more pressing than it is today. Arbitration as a mechanism for commercial dispute resolution has the potential to provide solutions for parties in receiving timely outcomes while also alleviating the significant burden of delayed cases which many courts now face. As has been the case throughout history, arbitration can be a vital means to support judiciaries and parties in achieving justice, even in the face of a global pandemic.
One area where the COVID-19 global pandemic’s impact has been deeply felt is in national courts. As of early 2020, the potential for contagion spread made in-person court appearances impossible in many jurisdictions. For some judicial systems, interim solutions to keep dockets moving were deployed, such as virtual hearings. But many judicial systems were forced to suspend operations altogether while solutions were developed. Even in jurisdictions that could immediately implement virtual settings, this did not always allow disputes to proceed uninterrupted. In some cases, moving to a virtual forum was not a comprehensive solution. The outcome is another looming crisis for many judiciaries around the world: a compounding bottleneck of cases that now threatens to overwhelm dockets in many regions for months or years to come.
As global justice systems seek long-term solutions to alleviate the burden that they now find themselves under, many are seeing the capacity for arbitration to provide a substantial contribution. Arbitration is a mechanism that has historically supplemented and supported domestic judiciaries and has the potential to do so now in a significant way. Moving disputes, especially commercial disputes, into arbitration provides a beneficial solution to both parties and judiciaries. This is because of the autonomy arbitration gives parties in choosing not only the process by which their dispute will be resolved, but also their decision maker.
Parties in arbitration have the freedom to select arbitrators based on any factors they deem relevant and desirable, such as experience as a judge or technical expertise in a certain industry. Parties in arbitration also have the ability to agree the briefing and hearing schedule of a dispute directly with their chosen arbitrators. They need not wait in a queue to appear on a docket. In turn, when parties resolve their dispute in arbitration instead of resorting to the courts, the courts’ dockets are freed up to address matters which cannot be heard in any other forum. This in turn alleviates the burden on national courts and ensures swifter due process for all.
Parties in arbitration can proceed with their disputes independent of the courts but with the assurance that the process is legally binding and enforceable. In most jurisdictions, the validity of arbitration is not tied to specific physical venues. Parties may choose any physical location for hearings that is convenient for them, even one outside the relevant jurisdiction. They may also choose to hold hearings virtually with all parties remaining in their home locales. The location of the proceedings in arbitration will often have no bearing on the law that is applied to the substantive dispute, nor on the enforceability of a resulting award.
For commercial disputes arising during the pandemic, arbitration has become an increasingly attractive option. But for commercial disputes that had already entered litigation and were stalled by the pandemic, arbitration may offer solutions to these parties as well. Parties may agree to move their existing disputes from litigation into arbitration on the condition that the arbitrator adopt any decisions already made by the courts. Parties may also choose to selectively define the substantive issues the arbitrator may consider. Parties may even choose a retired commercial judge or counsel with extensive commercial litigation experience as their arbitrator to ensure a cohesive transition from litigation to arbitration.
The due process concern that ‘justice delayed is justice denied’ has rarely been more pressing than it is today. Arbitration as a mechanism for commercial dispute resolution has the potential to provide solutions for parties in receiving timely outcomes while also alleviating the significant burden of delayed cases which many courts now face. As has been the case throughout history, arbitration can be a vital means to support judiciaries and parties in achieving justice, even in the face of a global pandemic.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
National courts are now running the bulk of the world’s war crimes cases and corporate prosecutions are part of this growing trend, reports Chris Stephen