*/
The range and volume of regulatory bodies and tribunals is enormous, encompassing a wide variety of human endeavour. Education, environment, finance, health, social care, transport, law… the list is endless. In order to exercise their judicial and quasi-judicial functions, these bodies establish panels to adjudicate on disputes, disciplinary matters, professional conduct, administrative appeals and many more matters. Chairs, panel members and legal assessors are usually a mix of legally qualified and non-legal appointees. Many appointments are ideally suited to the skills, experience, knowledge and interests of members of the Bar.
One of the main challenges is knowing who is recruiting, for which appointments, and when. The best way round this is to narrow down your field of interest, choose the type of activity which interests you most and then keep a close eye on the relevant websites. Get your name onto the relevant organisation’s newsletter or vacancies email list, so that you are one of the first to spot opportunities.
A good example is the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC), which is the statutory regulator of almost 300,000 professionals for 15 different health and care professions. It operates its own tribunal service, HCPTS. Hearings include a relevant professional, a lay panel member and a legal assessor, who offers advice on law and procedure. The legal assessor is independent from the panel – but assists in drafting decisions.
A key feature of the appointment process for legal assessors is successful demonstration by candidates of compliance with HCPC’s own ‘Competence Framework’. In addition to ‘Advising effectively’, there are five other required competencies: ‘Working with others’; ‘Exercising judgement’; ‘Demonstrating and building knowledge’; ‘Managing work efficiently’; and ‘Communicating effectively’. If you have ever applied for a judicial appointment, this ‘competence framework’ will sound familiar. It is based on the ‘Judicial Skills and Abilities Framework’ for the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary – and adapted specifically to the role of HCPC legal assessor. Similar arrangements are in place in the appointment processes for other regulatory roles.
The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) itself is responsible for the appointment of chairs, adjudicators, panel members and others to a variety of tribunals, including: ‘Appeal Tribunal, Trade Marks, Registered and Unregistered Design’; ‘Agricultural Land Tribunal, Wales’; ‘Upper Tribunal [Tax]’; ‘Special Educational Needs Tribunal’; ‘Road User Charging Adjudicators’; and the ‘Plants Varieties and Seeds Tribunal’. This last one is particularly exotic – and perhaps unique – in not having deliberated since 1984. But I hope that didn’t put you off from applying for the recently advertised position of Chair!
There is no single, uniform process applicable to appointments to regulatory roles. You will need to check carefully the precise process applicable to any role you are considering. The JAC’s appointment procedures for chairs and panel members are on similar lines to those used in recruiting judges.
Some preliminaries: before applying for any role, consider carefully whether you are ready. Do you meet the general eligibility requirements, for example, the ‘reasonable length of service’ provision, usually requiring you to expect to be able to serve for at least five years. Note that once the draft legislation on raising the mandatory retirement age for judicial office holders, currently before Parliament, becomes law, there will be more opportunities for older members of the profession. Another general eligibility requirement relates to ‘good character’. Do you satisfy the JAC’s guidance on good character and on suitability? Consider whether there is anything in your past conduct or current circumstances which could affect your application. There are also specific eligibility criteria relating to each post. Make sure you are able to comply with these too.
Self-assessment against the relevant competency framework is at the heart of every role or appointment for which you might apply. Successful completion of the self-assessment is key. The selection panel will be assessing the information in your self-assessment against the competency framework to help them decide whether you are appointable. Each competency comprises several descriptive bullet points. Read them carefully so that you know exactly what skills and experience you are being asked to demonstrate. You will need to provide specific examples. They are your evidence. How does your experience relate to each competency? How can you demonstrate competency compliance through past tasks, challenges, situations? Choose specific examples to match the competency areas. The JAC has said that the strongest self-assessments provide between one and three examples within each broad competency. Show clearly how you approached each situation and how you achieved a successful outcome.
Be concise. You are normally limited to about 250 words per competency. Be clear and explicit. Explain how your action(s) made a difference. Carefully select your strongest examples and keep a few others in reserve. Selection day panels are likely to ask you to expand on evidence in your self-assessment and you may have an opportunity to refer to additional examples – perhaps ones which have arisen since you submitted your written application. The JAC’s own website provides excellent guidance and prompts to help candidates decide which examples from the candidate’s own experience will be relevant to self-assessment under each heading. Don’t be too modest.
Demonstrating skills and abilities necessary for judicial appointment or suitability for regulatory roles does not always come easily to members of the Bar. Don’t misunderstand the process. You are not being asked for your opinion of yourself – but rather to show how you do, what you do. Articulating a challenging experience may involve recalling detail and nuance, enabling you to explain what you did, why and how.
Paul Secher LLB is Founding Director of ‘Judicial & Silk’ (formerly ‘JSB Judicial’), a professional firm specialising in career development in the legal profession, with particular reference to the judiciary, supporting those seeking appointment at all levels: www.judicial.org.uk; paul.secher@judicial.org.uk; 07956 528125.
The range and volume of regulatory bodies and tribunals is enormous, encompassing a wide variety of human endeavour. Education, environment, finance, health, social care, transport, law… the list is endless. In order to exercise their judicial and quasi-judicial functions, these bodies establish panels to adjudicate on disputes, disciplinary matters, professional conduct, administrative appeals and many more matters. Chairs, panel members and legal assessors are usually a mix of legally qualified and non-legal appointees. Many appointments are ideally suited to the skills, experience, knowledge and interests of members of the Bar.
One of the main challenges is knowing who is recruiting, for which appointments, and when. The best way round this is to narrow down your field of interest, choose the type of activity which interests you most and then keep a close eye on the relevant websites. Get your name onto the relevant organisation’s newsletter or vacancies email list, so that you are one of the first to spot opportunities.
A good example is the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC), which is the statutory regulator of almost 300,000 professionals for 15 different health and care professions. It operates its own tribunal service, HCPTS. Hearings include a relevant professional, a lay panel member and a legal assessor, who offers advice on law and procedure. The legal assessor is independent from the panel – but assists in drafting decisions.
A key feature of the appointment process for legal assessors is successful demonstration by candidates of compliance with HCPC’s own ‘Competence Framework’. In addition to ‘Advising effectively’, there are five other required competencies: ‘Working with others’; ‘Exercising judgement’; ‘Demonstrating and building knowledge’; ‘Managing work efficiently’; and ‘Communicating effectively’. If you have ever applied for a judicial appointment, this ‘competence framework’ will sound familiar. It is based on the ‘Judicial Skills and Abilities Framework’ for the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary – and adapted specifically to the role of HCPC legal assessor. Similar arrangements are in place in the appointment processes for other regulatory roles.
The Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) itself is responsible for the appointment of chairs, adjudicators, panel members and others to a variety of tribunals, including: ‘Appeal Tribunal, Trade Marks, Registered and Unregistered Design’; ‘Agricultural Land Tribunal, Wales’; ‘Upper Tribunal [Tax]’; ‘Special Educational Needs Tribunal’; ‘Road User Charging Adjudicators’; and the ‘Plants Varieties and Seeds Tribunal’. This last one is particularly exotic – and perhaps unique – in not having deliberated since 1984. But I hope that didn’t put you off from applying for the recently advertised position of Chair!
There is no single, uniform process applicable to appointments to regulatory roles. You will need to check carefully the precise process applicable to any role you are considering. The JAC’s appointment procedures for chairs and panel members are on similar lines to those used in recruiting judges.
Some preliminaries: before applying for any role, consider carefully whether you are ready. Do you meet the general eligibility requirements, for example, the ‘reasonable length of service’ provision, usually requiring you to expect to be able to serve for at least five years. Note that once the draft legislation on raising the mandatory retirement age for judicial office holders, currently before Parliament, becomes law, there will be more opportunities for older members of the profession. Another general eligibility requirement relates to ‘good character’. Do you satisfy the JAC’s guidance on good character and on suitability? Consider whether there is anything in your past conduct or current circumstances which could affect your application. There are also specific eligibility criteria relating to each post. Make sure you are able to comply with these too.
Self-assessment against the relevant competency framework is at the heart of every role or appointment for which you might apply. Successful completion of the self-assessment is key. The selection panel will be assessing the information in your self-assessment against the competency framework to help them decide whether you are appointable. Each competency comprises several descriptive bullet points. Read them carefully so that you know exactly what skills and experience you are being asked to demonstrate. You will need to provide specific examples. They are your evidence. How does your experience relate to each competency? How can you demonstrate competency compliance through past tasks, challenges, situations? Choose specific examples to match the competency areas. The JAC has said that the strongest self-assessments provide between one and three examples within each broad competency. Show clearly how you approached each situation and how you achieved a successful outcome.
Be concise. You are normally limited to about 250 words per competency. Be clear and explicit. Explain how your action(s) made a difference. Carefully select your strongest examples and keep a few others in reserve. Selection day panels are likely to ask you to expand on evidence in your self-assessment and you may have an opportunity to refer to additional examples – perhaps ones which have arisen since you submitted your written application. The JAC’s own website provides excellent guidance and prompts to help candidates decide which examples from the candidate’s own experience will be relevant to self-assessment under each heading. Don’t be too modest.
Demonstrating skills and abilities necessary for judicial appointment or suitability for regulatory roles does not always come easily to members of the Bar. Don’t misunderstand the process. You are not being asked for your opinion of yourself – but rather to show how you do, what you do. Articulating a challenging experience may involve recalling detail and nuance, enabling you to explain what you did, why and how.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
On the 50th anniversary of the pub bombings, even now it is still unresolved. Chris Mullin, the journalist and former MP who led the campaign leading to the release of the Birmingham Six, looks back at events
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
One year on and the Court of Appeal fails to quash convictions after receiving evidence of racism in the jury room, and there are still no revisions to the Equal Treatment Bench Book , says Keir Monteith KC
A cultural life and times
