*/
Profession
The first registration phase for the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) has been extended, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has announced. The closing date for the Midland and Western Circuits, which are the first required to register for the scheme, has been put back from 10 January 2014 to 7 March 2014.
Explaining the rationale behind the decision, BSB Chair Baroness Ruth Deech said: “The Ministry of Justice is scheduled to publish their final plans for legal aid during the first QASA registration period. Whilst QASA is a guardian of competence, not a pricing system, and sits separately from government plans, we recognise that the Bar will need time to reflect once the final legal aid plans have been announced.
“In addition to QASA, the BSB is working to help barristers adapt their business models so they can continue to provide excellent advocacy if the Government does choose to procure services in the new way,” she added.
All the Circuits apart from the Western, which was ballotting its members as Counsel went to press, have voted to boycott the scheme and pledged not to accept instructions on the Midland and Western Circuits. Announcing the result of the South Eastern Circuit vote on 20 May, Leader Sarah Forshaw QC said: “We have nothing to fear from a proper quality assessment... But what has emerged from the whole process is a quality assessment scheme that we believe to be fundamentally flawed.”
The BSB has denied any link between the extension and the boycott proposals. A spokesperson commented: “The BSB understands that the Circuits have voted to oppose quality appraisal as a means of expressing a view about the MoJ consultation on legal aid. That is misguided. QASA is there to protect the public from incompetence.
“The MoJ consultation raises distinct issues of public importance which need serious debate. A boycott of QASA is neither in the public interest nor an appropriate means of making that case.”
Michael Turner QC, Criminal Bar Association Chairman, said to Counsel: “If they are not linked, why not put off QASA until after the introduction of the contracts?”
The scheme’s final design was signed off by the BSB, the Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards in April and submitted to the Legal Services Board for approval on 8 May. Although failure to register for QASA is not in itself a breach of the Code of Conduct, it would be a disciplinary offence to undertake criminal advocacy without being part of QASA.
Explaining the rationale behind the decision, BSB Chair Baroness Ruth Deech said: “The Ministry of Justice is scheduled to publish their final plans for legal aid during the first QASA registration period. Whilst QASA is a guardian of competence, not a pricing system, and sits separately from government plans, we recognise that the Bar will need time to reflect once the final legal aid plans have been announced.
“In addition to QASA, the BSB is working to help barristers adapt their business models so they can continue to provide excellent advocacy if the Government does choose to procure services in the new way,” she added.
All the Circuits apart from the Western, which was ballotting its members as Counsel went to press, have voted to boycott the scheme and pledged not to accept instructions on the Midland and Western Circuits. Announcing the result of the South Eastern Circuit vote on 20 May, Leader Sarah Forshaw QC said: “We have nothing to fear from a proper quality assessment... But what has emerged from the whole process is a quality assessment scheme that we believe to be fundamentally flawed.”
The BSB has denied any link between the extension and the boycott proposals. A spokesperson commented: “The BSB understands that the Circuits have voted to oppose quality appraisal as a means of expressing a view about the MoJ consultation on legal aid. That is misguided. QASA is there to protect the public from incompetence.
“The MoJ consultation raises distinct issues of public importance which need serious debate. A boycott of QASA is neither in the public interest nor an appropriate means of making that case.”
Michael Turner QC, Criminal Bar Association Chairman, said to Counsel: “If they are not linked, why not put off QASA until after the introduction of the contracts?”
The scheme’s final design was signed off by the BSB, the Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards in April and submitted to the Legal Services Board for approval on 8 May. Although failure to register for QASA is not in itself a breach of the Code of Conduct, it would be a disciplinary offence to undertake criminal advocacy without being part of QASA.
Profession
The first registration phase for the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) has been extended, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has announced. The closing date for the Midland and Western Circuits, which are the first required to register for the scheme, has been put back from 10 January 2014 to 7 March 2014.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
