*/
The Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) is on course to open on 30 September for barristers undertaking criminal advocacy on the Midland and Western Circuits, following formal approval of the scheme from the Legal Services Board (LSB).
“While no single piece of evidence of systemically poor standards would suffice on its own to justify the scheme,” the LSB said, “there is sufficient consistency of evidence and concern to warrant a scheme such as that proposed by the application.”
The LSB concluded that the scheme was both “proportionate and targeted”, would provide “consistent and reliable data on the quality of criminal advocacy”, and that the planned review after two years would help to ensure that it continues to do so.
In its decision notice dated 26 July, the LSB noted that it had taken into account the issues raised in unsolicited correspondence, “including views opposing both the necessity of a scheme and the details of the particular scheme proposed”.
“Much of the disagreement,” the LSB said, “about the extent of low standards of criminal advocacy and the risks that this poses stems from the lack of consistent and measurable evidence available under the current arrangements... [W]ithout a quality assurance framework in place, it would be very difficult to find conclusive evidence of quality problems across criminal advocacy.”
Minor adjustments to the scheme Handbook and regulatory arrangements were made following requests for clarification by the LSB. Silks and plea-only advocates remain in the scheme.
Barristers undertaking advocacy in the criminal courts in England and Wales will need to register in three timed phases, according to the circuit in which they primarily practise. However, the circuits voted earlier this year to boycott QASA and pledged not to take criminal advocacy work from those on other Circuits.
Director of the Bar Standards Board (BSB), Dr Vanessa Davies, said that the process has been designed to be as straightforward as possible. “It takes about 10 minutes to register and the two-year evaluation period takes place during a barrister’s normal working routine. Judges have been trained to ensure that they only mark advocates against the QASA competencies and so barristers can be confident of a fair evaluation, which will have no bearing on the outcome of the trial.”
The Handbook, delayed from its June publication date following an LSB extension notice, was published in August (see https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.qasa). The BSB will run Q&A sessions during September in Bristol, Exeter, Birmingham and Nottingham, and has produced a CPDcast to help barristers “get to grips” with the scheme. (See also Joshua Rozenberg’s examination of QASA, Counsel, July, p 15.)
“While no single piece of evidence of systemically poor standards would suffice on its own to justify the scheme,” the LSB said, “there is sufficient consistency of evidence and concern to warrant a scheme such as that proposed by the application.”
The LSB concluded that the scheme was both “proportionate and targeted”, would provide “consistent and reliable data on the quality of criminal advocacy”, and that the planned review after two years would help to ensure that it continues to do so.
In its decision notice dated 26 July, the LSB noted that it had taken into account the issues raised in unsolicited correspondence, “including views opposing both the necessity of a scheme and the details of the particular scheme proposed”.
“Much of the disagreement,” the LSB said, “about the extent of low standards of criminal advocacy and the risks that this poses stems from the lack of consistent and measurable evidence available under the current arrangements... [W]ithout a quality assurance framework in place, it would be very difficult to find conclusive evidence of quality problems across criminal advocacy.”
Minor adjustments to the scheme Handbook and regulatory arrangements were made following requests for clarification by the LSB. Silks and plea-only advocates remain in the scheme.
Barristers undertaking advocacy in the criminal courts in England and Wales will need to register in three timed phases, according to the circuit in which they primarily practise. However, the circuits voted earlier this year to boycott QASA and pledged not to take criminal advocacy work from those on other Circuits.
Director of the Bar Standards Board (BSB), Dr Vanessa Davies, said that the process has been designed to be as straightforward as possible. “It takes about 10 minutes to register and the two-year evaluation period takes place during a barrister’s normal working routine. Judges have been trained to ensure that they only mark advocates against the QASA competencies and so barristers can be confident of a fair evaluation, which will have no bearing on the outcome of the trial.”
The Handbook, delayed from its June publication date following an LSB extension notice, was published in August (see https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.qasa). The BSB will run Q&A sessions during September in Bristol, Exeter, Birmingham and Nottingham, and has produced a CPDcast to help barristers “get to grips” with the scheme. (See also Joshua Rozenberg’s examination of QASA, Counsel, July, p 15.)
The Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) is on course to open on 30 September for barristers undertaking criminal advocacy on the Midland and Western Circuits, following formal approval of the scheme from the Legal Services Board (LSB).
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
In an era of patient-centred care and growing concern over misconduct in medical settings, why do women still lack the right to choose women consultants for examination and treatment? Charles Davey investigates
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
