*/
Profession
The Bar Standards Board is pressing ahead with preparatory steps for the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA), despite a judicial review launched against the scheme last month.
Proceedings were issued by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) over the legality of the scheme in September. Respondents served are the Legal Services Board (LSB), with the Bar Standards Board (BSB), Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards as interested parties.
Public law specialists, consulted over the summer by the CBA, had advised that QASA was open to legal challenge “for reasons far broader and fundamental than the legitimate objections already raised by the Criminal Bar,” said Nigel Lithman QC, new Chair of the CBA. Judicial review was an “inevitable step”, he said, but success was “not guaranteed”.
Dinah Rose QC and Tom De La Mare QC of Blackstone Chambers, and Joanna Ludlum of Baker McKenzie, are acting pro bono, with the action indemnified by the CBA.
The LSB has said it will respond to the judicial review “in line with established procedures” and will make every effort to “limit the cost exposure of the legal profession to this action on behalf of the criminal Bar”. Lithman, who previously accused the BSB of “meanness of spirit” in not declaring the same, said that “current exchanges involved our trying to cap the cost of proceedings”.
Vanessa Davies, Director of the BSB, confirmed that: “The claimants, the LSB (as defendants) and the BSB as an interested party have written to the court regarding costs. This is a matter for the court to decide. The BSB has now written twice to Baker and McKenzie who are acting for the claimants and the CBA, offering to discuss a suitable costs cap: there was no response to this suggestion.”
No stay of steps towards implementation had been sought, said the BSB, and the scheme will remain open for registration. If permission for judicial review is granted, the case would be “heard and decided before any assessments are made and the first phase of registration ends,” it added.
Proceedings were issued by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) over the legality of the scheme in September. Respondents served are the Legal Services Board (LSB), with the Bar Standards Board (BSB), Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards as interested parties.
Public law specialists, consulted over the summer by the CBA, had advised that QASA was open to legal challenge “for reasons far broader and fundamental than the legitimate objections already raised by the Criminal Bar,” said Nigel Lithman QC, new Chair of the CBA. Judicial review was an “inevitable step”, he said, but success was “not guaranteed”.
Dinah Rose QC and Tom De La Mare QC of Blackstone Chambers, and Joanna Ludlum of Baker McKenzie, are acting pro bono, with the action indemnified by the CBA.
The LSB has said it will respond to the judicial review “in line with established procedures” and will make every effort to “limit the cost exposure of the legal profession to this action on behalf of the criminal Bar”. Lithman, who previously accused the BSB of “meanness of spirit” in not declaring the same, said that “current exchanges involved our trying to cap the cost of proceedings”.
Vanessa Davies, Director of the BSB, confirmed that: “The claimants, the LSB (as defendants) and the BSB as an interested party have written to the court regarding costs. This is a matter for the court to decide. The BSB has now written twice to Baker and McKenzie who are acting for the claimants and the CBA, offering to discuss a suitable costs cap: there was no response to this suggestion.”
No stay of steps towards implementation had been sought, said the BSB, and the scheme will remain open for registration. If permission for judicial review is granted, the case would be “heard and decided before any assessments are made and the first phase of registration ends,” it added.
Profession
The Bar Standards Board is pressing ahead with preparatory steps for the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA), despite a judicial review launched against the scheme last month.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
In an era of patient-centred care and growing concern over misconduct in medical settings, why do women still lack the right to choose women consultants for examination and treatment? Charles Davey investigates
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
