*/
Profession
The Bar Standards Board is pressing ahead with preparatory steps for the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA), despite a judicial review launched against the scheme last month.
Proceedings were issued by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) over the legality of the scheme in September. Respondents served are the Legal Services Board (LSB), with the Bar Standards Board (BSB), Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards as interested parties.
Public law specialists, consulted over the summer by the CBA, had advised that QASA was open to legal challenge “for reasons far broader and fundamental than the legitimate objections already raised by the Criminal Bar,” said Nigel Lithman QC, new Chair of the CBA. Judicial review was an “inevitable step”, he said, but success was “not guaranteed”.
Dinah Rose QC and Tom De La Mare QC of Blackstone Chambers, and Joanna Ludlum of Baker McKenzie, are acting pro bono, with the action indemnified by the CBA.
The LSB has said it will respond to the judicial review “in line with established procedures” and will make every effort to “limit the cost exposure of the legal profession to this action on behalf of the criminal Bar”. Lithman, who previously accused the BSB of “meanness of spirit” in not declaring the same, said that “current exchanges involved our trying to cap the cost of proceedings”.
Vanessa Davies, Director of the BSB, confirmed that: “The claimants, the LSB (as defendants) and the BSB as an interested party have written to the court regarding costs. This is a matter for the court to decide. The BSB has now written twice to Baker and McKenzie who are acting for the claimants and the CBA, offering to discuss a suitable costs cap: there was no response to this suggestion.”
No stay of steps towards implementation had been sought, said the BSB, and the scheme will remain open for registration. If permission for judicial review is granted, the case would be “heard and decided before any assessments are made and the first phase of registration ends,” it added.
Proceedings were issued by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) over the legality of the scheme in September. Respondents served are the Legal Services Board (LSB), with the Bar Standards Board (BSB), Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards as interested parties.
Public law specialists, consulted over the summer by the CBA, had advised that QASA was open to legal challenge “for reasons far broader and fundamental than the legitimate objections already raised by the Criminal Bar,” said Nigel Lithman QC, new Chair of the CBA. Judicial review was an “inevitable step”, he said, but success was “not guaranteed”.
Dinah Rose QC and Tom De La Mare QC of Blackstone Chambers, and Joanna Ludlum of Baker McKenzie, are acting pro bono, with the action indemnified by the CBA.
The LSB has said it will respond to the judicial review “in line with established procedures” and will make every effort to “limit the cost exposure of the legal profession to this action on behalf of the criminal Bar”. Lithman, who previously accused the BSB of “meanness of spirit” in not declaring the same, said that “current exchanges involved our trying to cap the cost of proceedings”.
Vanessa Davies, Director of the BSB, confirmed that: “The claimants, the LSB (as defendants) and the BSB as an interested party have written to the court regarding costs. This is a matter for the court to decide. The BSB has now written twice to Baker and McKenzie who are acting for the claimants and the CBA, offering to discuss a suitable costs cap: there was no response to this suggestion.”
No stay of steps towards implementation had been sought, said the BSB, and the scheme will remain open for registration. If permission for judicial review is granted, the case would be “heard and decided before any assessments are made and the first phase of registration ends,” it added.
Profession
The Bar Standards Board is pressing ahead with preparatory steps for the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA), despite a judicial review launched against the scheme last month.
The Bar Council will press for investment in justice at party conferences, the Chancellor’s Budget and Spending Review
Equip yourself for your new career at the Bar
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth explores some key steps to take when starting out as a barrister in order to secure your financial future
Millicent Wild of 5 Essex Chambers describes her pupillage experience
Drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Juno Women’s Aid in Nottingham as part of its Giving Back campaign
Casedo explains how to hit the ground running on your next case with a four-step plan to transform the way you work
To mark the fifth anniversary of the Bar Standards Board’s Race Equality Taskforce, Dee Sekar reflects on key milestones, the role of regulation in race equality, and calls for views on the upcoming equality rules consultation
Christianah Babajide talks to four female senior clerks who share insights for aspiring clerks, especially women, as well as their hopes for the future of the profession
Daniel Barnett serves up a host of summer shows
Britain needs to get over its shameful denial of racism, call it what it is and start to effectively deal with the problem, says Vithyah Chelvam
An epic failure of public policy has filled our crumbling prisons to capacity, says Lord Ken Macdonald KC. How did we get here, and what might reform look like?
