*/
Aaron Mayers
Pupillage applications are fundamentally about demonstrating that you have: (i) the skills, qualities and the potential to succeed at your chosen chambers; and (ii) a good understanding of chambers’ business model and how to make your practice a success.
It is therefore imperative to bear these two objectives in mind when answering competency-based questions about your skills and qualities. Looking back at the drafts of my pupillage applications, there is an evident distinction between my earlier attempts, and the later applications which secured numerous interviews. In my latter applications, every answer passed the ‘so what’ test.
Name-dropping and merely listing examples of various accomplishments is not enough. Every example of a skill or quality that you provide should be explicitly tethered to one of chambers’ mark scheme competencies. You can also go one step further and state how you envisage the said skill or quality will assist you at the Bar on a day-to-day basis.
It is helpful to put yourself in the position of the application marker. They know nothing about you. Avoid leaving it to them to read in between the lines and interpret the implied relevance of your anecdotes. Instead, ask yourself whether the answer you have provided passes the ‘so what’ test.
The pupillage application form is not an opportunity to copy and paste your CV. Take full advantage of the opportunity to fulfil both of the objectives at i) and ii) above and extract the full value from your accomplishments and experiences by articulating precisely how they increase your value as a prospective pupil.
Joel Semakula
Start early. Pupillage applications often take longer than expected. Leave time for research, the processing of comments from reviewers and redrafting.
Tailor your application. There are a number of ways to get specific information: mini pupillages, open days, chambers’ websites, twitter, lawcareers.net and free publications such as the Chambers & Partners Student Guide. Be precise, concise and make sure the practice areas in which you express such passion truly reflect that set’s key areas of focus.
Quality over quantity. There is no magic number of applications. Each one should be the best it can be. Submit enough to ensure you are giving yourself a real chance at success in the process.
Non-legal experience is just as important as your legal experience. It is often a differentiating factor. Do not just list experience. Articulate the skills gained that will make you a more effective barrister.
Brevity. Use simple sentences, clear language and even bullet points, where appropriate. Busy barristers read these applications taking time out of their paid practice. Make it easy for them to get the information they need, score you highly and invite you back.
Inner Temple produces a helpful list of potential questions for a pupillage interview (see: bit.ly/3kaBz1S). Work your way through it – you will inevitably be asked one or more of these questions.
Pick three things that you want to make sure the panel know about you by end of the interview. Have these on your mind as you walk into the room and work them into the interview (naturally), where possible. One of my things was my experience doing live comedy.
Problem/debate questions. These are often a real opportunity to shine. As part of my preparation, I created structured plans that would help me tackle any problem question in my key practice areas. Once in the room, I focused on structure as well as content – structure is where most candidates fall down.
Ask clarifying questions. The panel wants you to succeed, which you will not if you do not understand the question. So just ask if you need to.
Keep a note. As somebody who went through this process more than once, I found it helpful to write down the questions I was asked immediately after the interview. It helped me reflect on how I would answer the same question if asked again and aided my preparation the following year.
Good luck!
Holly Challenger
Be yourself in your application forms and let some of your personality come through. Don’t just write answers that you think chambers want to hear. It may get you an interview, but it will be obvious at interview if your answers were not genuine.
Panels are very likely to ask you questions about your application form at some point during the interview, so make sure that you can expand on what you’ve written.
The person reading your application will have many others to read, so make it easy for them and write clearly. A good piece of advice I received was that your written application is the first piece of ‘written advocacy’ that chambers will see from you. Consider the format of your application and be concise where you can. For some questions, bullet points or numbering your points might be more appropriate than writing in long paragraphs.
When preparing for interviews, make sure that you can answer questions such as ‘why this area of law’ and ‘why have you applied to this chambers’. But as well as those predictable questions, you are likely to be asked questions for which you have not prepared. How you respond to those questions is important. If you need a minute to think about it, ask for one. The panel will want to see how you cope under pressure as that is part of the job of a barrister.
Knowledge of your chosen area of law is also essential as you are likely to encounter a legal problem question at some point. Keep up to date on recent developments and have an opinion that you can justify. The panel might not agree with you, but they will be interested in your reasons.
Leah Redden
My interview with Browne Jacobson LLP was my first pupillage interview, and with that came a lot of nerves so I knew that I needed to prepare as much as possible. That is why my key tip is preparation.
I was asked to prepare an application to strike out proceedings, which was provided to me seven days before my interview. Having been given this in advance, I knew this was an opportunity for me to demonstrate my preparation and organisational skills to the panel. Although I had some experience in civil applications, having worked as a county court advocate, I had not actually completed an application to strike out.
I felt the best approach for the legal scenario was to ensure I understood all of the surrounding law before approaching the hard facts. This safeguarded against any unexpected issues or questions that could crop up during the exercise and meant that when I was asked a question surrounding the law in the interview I was able to answer with confidence and demonstrate my advocacy skills and ability to ‘think on my feet’.
We then moved to the ‘interview’ section where the panel had the opportunity to get to know me. Again, I had prepared for the questions I thought might be asked, but also held in my mind that I may be asked questions I had not prepared for – which I was. Prior to the interview I gave myself a small pep talk and I told myself, whatever you do, remain calm and be yourself. I think this is very important as this allows you to display your confidence but also give the panel an idea of who they will be working alongside as this will be of great importance.
Joel Semakula is a tenant at Landmark Chambers specialising in planning, property, public and environmental law. Away from the law, Joel volunteers with social mobility initiatives and is also a performer on the comedy circuit.
Leah Redden joined Browne Jacobson for pupillage in October 2020. Since joining, Leah has been heavily involved in the prosecution of teachers in professional discipline proceedings on behalf of the Teaching Regulation Agency.
Aaron Mayers
Pupillage applications are fundamentally about demonstrating that you have: (i) the skills, qualities and the potential to succeed at your chosen chambers; and (ii) a good understanding of chambers’ business model and how to make your practice a success.
It is therefore imperative to bear these two objectives in mind when answering competency-based questions about your skills and qualities. Looking back at the drafts of my pupillage applications, there is an evident distinction between my earlier attempts, and the later applications which secured numerous interviews. In my latter applications, every answer passed the ‘so what’ test.
Name-dropping and merely listing examples of various accomplishments is not enough. Every example of a skill or quality that you provide should be explicitly tethered to one of chambers’ mark scheme competencies. You can also go one step further and state how you envisage the said skill or quality will assist you at the Bar on a day-to-day basis.
It is helpful to put yourself in the position of the application marker. They know nothing about you. Avoid leaving it to them to read in between the lines and interpret the implied relevance of your anecdotes. Instead, ask yourself whether the answer you have provided passes the ‘so what’ test.
The pupillage application form is not an opportunity to copy and paste your CV. Take full advantage of the opportunity to fulfil both of the objectives at i) and ii) above and extract the full value from your accomplishments and experiences by articulating precisely how they increase your value as a prospective pupil.
Joel Semakula
Start early. Pupillage applications often take longer than expected. Leave time for research, the processing of comments from reviewers and redrafting.
Tailor your application. There are a number of ways to get specific information: mini pupillages, open days, chambers’ websites, twitter, lawcareers.net and free publications such as the Chambers & Partners Student Guide. Be precise, concise and make sure the practice areas in which you express such passion truly reflect that set’s key areas of focus.
Quality over quantity. There is no magic number of applications. Each one should be the best it can be. Submit enough to ensure you are giving yourself a real chance at success in the process.
Non-legal experience is just as important as your legal experience. It is often a differentiating factor. Do not just list experience. Articulate the skills gained that will make you a more effective barrister.
Brevity. Use simple sentences, clear language and even bullet points, where appropriate. Busy barristers read these applications taking time out of their paid practice. Make it easy for them to get the information they need, score you highly and invite you back.
Inner Temple produces a helpful list of potential questions for a pupillage interview (see: bit.ly/3kaBz1S). Work your way through it – you will inevitably be asked one or more of these questions.
Pick three things that you want to make sure the panel know about you by end of the interview. Have these on your mind as you walk into the room and work them into the interview (naturally), where possible. One of my things was my experience doing live comedy.
Problem/debate questions. These are often a real opportunity to shine. As part of my preparation, I created structured plans that would help me tackle any problem question in my key practice areas. Once in the room, I focused on structure as well as content – structure is where most candidates fall down.
Ask clarifying questions. The panel wants you to succeed, which you will not if you do not understand the question. So just ask if you need to.
Keep a note. As somebody who went through this process more than once, I found it helpful to write down the questions I was asked immediately after the interview. It helped me reflect on how I would answer the same question if asked again and aided my preparation the following year.
Good luck!
Holly Challenger
Be yourself in your application forms and let some of your personality come through. Don’t just write answers that you think chambers want to hear. It may get you an interview, but it will be obvious at interview if your answers were not genuine.
Panels are very likely to ask you questions about your application form at some point during the interview, so make sure that you can expand on what you’ve written.
The person reading your application will have many others to read, so make it easy for them and write clearly. A good piece of advice I received was that your written application is the first piece of ‘written advocacy’ that chambers will see from you. Consider the format of your application and be concise where you can. For some questions, bullet points or numbering your points might be more appropriate than writing in long paragraphs.
When preparing for interviews, make sure that you can answer questions such as ‘why this area of law’ and ‘why have you applied to this chambers’. But as well as those predictable questions, you are likely to be asked questions for which you have not prepared. How you respond to those questions is important. If you need a minute to think about it, ask for one. The panel will want to see how you cope under pressure as that is part of the job of a barrister.
Knowledge of your chosen area of law is also essential as you are likely to encounter a legal problem question at some point. Keep up to date on recent developments and have an opinion that you can justify. The panel might not agree with you, but they will be interested in your reasons.
Leah Redden
My interview with Browne Jacobson LLP was my first pupillage interview, and with that came a lot of nerves so I knew that I needed to prepare as much as possible. That is why my key tip is preparation.
I was asked to prepare an application to strike out proceedings, which was provided to me seven days before my interview. Having been given this in advance, I knew this was an opportunity for me to demonstrate my preparation and organisational skills to the panel. Although I had some experience in civil applications, having worked as a county court advocate, I had not actually completed an application to strike out.
I felt the best approach for the legal scenario was to ensure I understood all of the surrounding law before approaching the hard facts. This safeguarded against any unexpected issues or questions that could crop up during the exercise and meant that when I was asked a question surrounding the law in the interview I was able to answer with confidence and demonstrate my advocacy skills and ability to ‘think on my feet’.
We then moved to the ‘interview’ section where the panel had the opportunity to get to know me. Again, I had prepared for the questions I thought might be asked, but also held in my mind that I may be asked questions I had not prepared for – which I was. Prior to the interview I gave myself a small pep talk and I told myself, whatever you do, remain calm and be yourself. I think this is very important as this allows you to display your confidence but also give the panel an idea of who they will be working alongside as this will be of great importance.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
National courts are now running the bulk of the world’s war crimes cases and corporate prosecutions are part of this growing trend, reports Chris Stephen
Let’s hear it for the assessors, says Dame Anne Rafferty of the KC Selection Panel. And to make silk assessors’ lives a little easier when applicants come calling in May, Dame Anne fields some commonly asked questions
